Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This research introduces a formal framework for managing belief conflicts in multi-agent systems when their observational capabilities change dynamically at runtime. By combining answer set programming with Python, the approach ensures that explanations remain complete even as agents refine or coarsen their information partitions. The work advances theoretical foundations for robust AI coordination in environments where agent resolution levels are heterogeneous and evolving.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv

Explainable Belief Harmonization under Dynamic Epistemic Partitions

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2607.21210v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing approaches to multi-agent belief combination have established mature foundations for combining uncertain beliefs under common assumptions: consensus methods use iterative averaging, logic-based methods resolve conflicting knowledge bases, and epistemic logic analyzes agents' information states. Typically, these approaches assume that the structure determining what each agent can represent remains fixed. However, in many scenarios, agents gain or lose observational capacity during execution, and what was once admissible may become structurally impossible. This paper presents a formal framework for handling such runtime changes in epistemic partitions over continuous belief profiles. A hybrid approach exploits the advantages of answer set programming in elaboration tolerance, declarative integrity constraints, and explanations, with the numerical flexibility of Python. The framework applies to domains where agents operate at heterogeneous and possibly changing levels of resolution, and provides formal guarantees of admissibility preservation under refinement, unique mass-preserving repair under coarsening, and explanation completeness. Evaluation across 100 randomly generated topology changes confirms complete violation detection and explanation coverage.

Abstract:Existing approaches to multi-agent belief combination have established mature foundations for combining uncertain beliefs under common assumptions: consensus methods use iterative averaging, logic-based methods resolve conflicting knowledge bases, and epistemic logic analyzes agents' information states. Typically, these approaches assume that the structure determining what each agent can represent remains fixed. However, in many scenarios, agents gain or lose observational capacity during execution, and what was once admissible may become structurally impossible. This paper presents a formal framework for handling such runtime changes in epistemic partitions over continuous belief profiles. A hybrid approach exploits the advantages of answer set programming in elaboration tolerance, declarative integrity constraints, and explanations, with the numerical flexibility of Python. The framework applies to domains where agents operate at heterogeneous and possibly changing levels of resolution, and provides formal guarantees of admissibility preservation under refinement, unique mass-preserving repair under coarsening, and explanation completeness. Evaluation across 100 randomly generated topology changes confirms complete violation detection and explanation coverage.

In Proceedings ICLP 2026, arXiv:2607.17707

Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)

arXiv:2607.21210 [cs.LO]

(or arXiv:2607.21210v1 [cs.LO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.21210 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

EPTCS 450, 2026, pp. 529-543

https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.450.39 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 282 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe