Expert-Play Contouring Control: Faster-than-Demonstration Planning from Slow Expert and Fast Play

arXiv:2609.22798v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Expert demonstrations often specify what a robot should do, but not how fast it can do it. Imitation Learning (IL) inherits demonstration timing, while directly accelerating the learned motion can fail when faster execution changes the robot-object dynamics. We study faster-than-demonstration execution as a dynamics-aware control problem and introduce Expert-Play Contouring Control (EPCC), which combines slow expert demonstrations with fast, non-expert play. Expert demonstrations train a latent trajectory generator whose predictions are reparameterized into a time-independent contour of successful task progression, while play trains a world model (WM) of fast-action outcomes. At deployment, our proposed planner uses the WM to optimize actions that makes maximize progress along the expert-derived contour while penalizing deviation from the intended task evolution. Averaged across three visuomotor manipulation tasks, EPCC achieves a $2.0\times$ the throughput of the IL baseline, including $2.2\times$ that of the throughput of the strongest acceleration baseline on a task with interaction-sensitive object dynamics. Our analysis shows that the gains concentrate where faster execution changes robot-object evolution. Together, our results highlight a simple yet effective principle: demonstrations provide task intent, while play data provides the dynamic coverage needed to execute that intent faster.

Abstract:Expert demonstrations often specify what a robot should do, but not how fast it can do it. Imitation Learning (IL) inherits demonstration timing, while directly accelerating the learned motion can fail when faster execution changes the robot-object dynamics. We study faster-than-demonstration execution as a dynamics-aware control problem and introduce Expert-Play Contouring Control (EPCC), which combines slow expert demonstrations with fast, non-expert play. Expert demonstrations train a latent trajectory generator whose predictions are reparameterized into a time-independent contour of successful task progression, while play trains a world model (WM) of fast-action outcomes. At deployment, our proposed planner uses the WM to optimize actions that makes maximize progress along the expert-derived contour while penalizing deviation from the intended task evolution. Averaged across three visuomotor manipulation tasks, EPCC achieves a $2.0\times$ the throughput of the IL baseline, including $2.2\times$ that of the throughput of the strongest acceleration baseline on a task with interaction-sensitive object dynamics. Our analysis shows that the gains concentrate where faster execution changes robot-object evolution. Together, our results highlight a simple yet effective principle: demonstrations provide task intent, while play data provides the dynamic coverage needed to execute that intent faster.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.22798 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.22798v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22798 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

analiza aiqbench

Expert-Play Contouring Control: Faster-than-Demonstration Planning from Slow Expert and Fast Play

Subiecte conexe