analiza aiqbench
EviStreams addresses the critical bottleneck in medical systematic reviews by integrating large language models into a strict, protocol-driven workflow that preserves reproducibility and auditability. The research demonstrates that structured field specifications are far more influential than the underlying model choice for extraction quality, offering a practical solution for domain experts who need to maintain rigorous standards while leveraging AI assistance.
EviStreams: Human-in-the-Loop AI Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews in Medicine
arXiv:2609.27418v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Systematic reviews underpin clinical guidelines, yet their data-extraction step is a major expert-labor bottleneck bound by a protocolized workflow: two reviewers extract each study independently, an adjudicator resolves disagreements, and the team keeps an auditable record of how every value was produced. Large language models can assist with extraction, but that assistance must fit established review protocols and preserve reproducibility. We present EviStreams, a live, open-source, no-code web platform that puts review teams in control of AI-assisted extraction at three key stages: program design (a structured decomposition approved before any code runs), field specification (typed field definitions calibrated from a pilot), and extracted predictions (reviewer-blinded dual review with adjudication). Working through a form builder, a domain expert defines typed fields rather than prompts, runs extraction over uploaded PDFs, inspects every value alongside the supporting passage it came from, and resolves a reviewer-blinded dual review into an auditable consensus export. An evaluation across four clinical corpora and three frontier model families, released with the system, shows that extraction quality is shaped far more by the field specification than by the choice of model. EviStreams is live at https://evistreams.com/demo and released under Apache-2.0.
Abstract:Systematic reviews underpin clinical guidelines, yet their data-extraction step is a major expert-labor bottleneck bound by a protocolized workflow: two reviewers extract each study independently, an adjudicator resolves disagreements, and the team keeps an auditable record of how every value was produced. Large language models can assist with extraction, but that assistance must fit established review protocols and preserve reproducibility. We present EviStreams, a live, open-source, no-code web platform that puts review teams in control of AI-assisted extraction at three key stages: program design (a structured decomposition approved before any code runs), field specification (typed field definitions calibrated from a pilot), and extracted predictions (reviewer-blinded dual review with adjudication). Working through a form builder, a domain expert defines typed fields rather than prompts, runs extraction over uploaded PDFs, inspects every value alongside the supporting passage it came from, and resolves a reviewer-blinded dual review into an auditable consensus export. An evaluation across four clinical corpora and three frontier model families, released with the system, shows that extraction quality is shaped far more by the field specification than by the choice of model. EviStreams is live at this https URL and released under Apache-2.0.
12 pages, 5 figures. Accepted to EMNLP 2026 System Demonstrations
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.27418 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.27418v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27418 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 298 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

AgentOps: Operationalize agentic AI at scale with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · 1 iun. 2026

Reviewing failure modes in science as we prepare for AI researchers
LessWrong · 8 oct. 2026
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · 15 iun. 2026
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · 12 iun. 2026