analiza aiqbench
This pilot study investigates how generative AI systems infer personal attributes from conversational data, revealing that models readily construct psychological and behavioral profiles even without explicit factual support. The findings highlight significant privacy risks where "Inference" outputs generate detailed user portraits based on indirect context rather than direct facts. These results are critical for understanding the boundaries of current LLM capabilities regarding sensitive personal information leakage.
Evaluating Personal Information Output from Conversational Interactions in Generative AI Systems
arXiv:2609.22204v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This exploratory pilot study evaluates the scope and perceived accuracy of personal information output from ongoing conversational interactions in generative AI systems using GPT-5.2 Instant and GPT-5.2 Thinking, categorized into three output types: Fact, Inference, and Confidence. Based on the evaluation results obtained from 15 Japanese participants, differences in model design have limited impact on personal information output tendencies. Compared with the Inference type, the Fact type shows a more conservative output pattern. Regarding attribute categories, the findings indicate that Core Personal attributes associated with identification are treated relatively conservatively, whereas Behavioral and Linguistic attributes show higher accuracy across both Fact and Inference outputs. Furthermore, Holistic Profile, Psychological and Cognitive, and Residual attributes are more readily inferred, even when not supported by explicit factual outputs. Notably, the lack of null outputs for these attributes in the Inference type suggests that such inferred profiles may be constructed from indirectly available contextual information. The findings may contribute to future discussions regarding privacy awareness and personal information inference in generative AI systems.
Abstract:This exploratory pilot study evaluates the scope and perceived accuracy of personal information output from ongoing conversational interactions in generative AI systems using GPT-5.2 Instant and GPT-5.2 Thinking, categorized into three output types: Fact, Inference, and Confidence. Based on the evaluation results obtained from 15 Japanese participants, differences in model design have limited impact on personal information output tendencies. Compared with the Inference type, the Fact type shows a more conservative output pattern. Regarding attribute categories, the findings indicate that Core Personal attributes associated with identification are treated relatively conservatively, whereas Behavioral and Linguistic attributes show higher accuracy across both Fact and Inference outputs. Furthermore, Holistic Profile, Psychological and Cognitive, and Residual attributes are more readily inferred, even when not supported by explicit factual outputs. Notably, the lack of null outputs for these attributes in the Inference type suggests that such inferred profiles may be constructed from indirectly available contextual information. The findings may contribute to future discussions regarding privacy awareness and personal information inference in generative AI systems.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
arXiv:2609.22204 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.22204v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22204 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
https://doi.org/10.23919/IIAI-AAICPS00095.2026.00071 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 281 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Presentation: From AI Agent Demo to Production: Automated Testing and Evaluation
InfoQ · 7 sept. 2026

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · 25 sept. 2026

Projection sampling preserves capabilities but diminishes gains from alignment fine-tuning
LessWrong · 16 oct. 2026

Natera’s intelligent appointment scheduling with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · 26 aug. 2026