Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This study provides a rigorous, execution-based audit of neural decompilation for Dart AOT binaries, revealing significant functional regressions in current LLM adapters and exposing the weak correlation between standard metrics like CodeBLEU and actual compilation success. By isolating semantic cues from binary inputs, the research demonstrates that existing evaluation frameworks often fail to capture true model reliability, offering critical insights for developers relying on AI-driven reverse engineering tools.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Evaluating Neural Decompilation of Dart AOT Binaries: Fine-Tuning, Metric Validity, Specification Leakage, and Reliability

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2607.06125v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present an execution-based evaluation of neural decompilation for Dart ahead-of-time binaries and an audit of what its scores measure. Across six archived adapter-baseline comparisons, paired tests of pass@k at k = 1, 5, and 10, with Holm adjustment over 18 endpoints, identify functional regressions in both Qwen3-8B adapters at every k. The other four comparisons are inconclusive. On 141 reference-certified, contract-valid tasks, three independently trained graph-prefix systems score the same candidates. Best CodeBLEU has modest association with pass@10 ($\rho$ = .218-.246), compile@10 has weak association ($\rho$ = .072-.082), and only 21.0-23.3% of compiling candidates pass. A paired single-seed intervention that removes semantic names and related cues, while retaining types, arity, and instruction content, reduces coverage from 42/154 to 7/154 tasks. Matched graph perturbations show no detectable degradation under the semantic contract (six-test Holm p >= .750); instruction-use attribution remains unresolved. Across five decoding seeds on MF-174, the baseline solves 4.8 tasks on average, 15 at least once, and one in every seed. We recommend certifying references, aligning metrics on shared candidates, separating metadata from binary input, repeating sampling, and preserving provenance. The released capsule supports integrity checks and replay of archived outcomes.

Abstract:We present an execution-based evaluation of neural decompilation for Dart ahead-of-time binaries and an audit of what its scores measure. Across six archived adapter-baseline comparisons, paired tests of pass@k at k = 1, 5, and 10, with Holm adjustment over 18 endpoints, identify functional regressions in both Qwen3-8B adapters at every k. The other four comparisons are inconclusive. On 141 reference-certified, contract-valid tasks, three independently trained graph-prefix systems score the same candidates. Best CodeBLEU has modest association with pass@10 ($\rho$ = .218-.246), compile@10 has weak association ($\rho$ = .072-.082), and only 21.0-23.3% of compiling candidates pass. A paired single-seed intervention that removes semantic names and related cues, while retaining types, arity, and instruction content, reduces coverage from 42/154 to 7/154 tasks. Matched graph perturbations show no detectable degradation under the semantic contract (six-test Holm p >= .750); instruction-use attribution remains unresolved. Across five decoding seeds on MF-174, the baseline solves 4.8 tasks on average, 15 at least once, and one in every seed. We recommend certifying references, aligning metrics on shared candidates, separating metadata from binary input, repeating sampling, and preserving provenance. The released capsule supports integrity checks and replay of archived outcomes.

Under review at ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) after getting a major revision. This is the preprint

Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)

D.2.5; D.3.4; I.2.7

arXiv:2607.06125 [cs.SE]

(or arXiv:2607.06125v2 [cs.SE] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.06125 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 315 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe