analiza aiqbench
This paper introduces Precise Quantifier (PQ), a Bayesian method designed to improve the accuracy of prevalence estimation by effectively leveraging validation data to narrow prediction intervals. The research demonstrates that PQ outperforms existing approaches, particularly as classifier discriminative power and validation dataset sizes increase, offering a significant advancement in uncertainty quantification for class distribution tasks.
Estimating prevalence with precision and accuracy
arXiv:2507.06061v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Unlike classification, whose goal is to estimate the class of each data point, quantification (or prevalence estimation) aims to estimate the distribution of classes in a dataset. An important task in prevalence estimation is to quantify the uncertainty in prevalence estimates. In this paper, we introduce Precise Quantifier (PQ), a Bayesian aggregative quantifier that achieves narrow prediction intervals with sufficient coverage (i.e., sufficient proportion of intervals containing the true prevalence). We find that PQ produces more precise prevalence estimates than existing methods as the discriminative power of the underlying classifier increases and as the validation-to-test size ratio increases. These empirical results suggest that PQ uses validation information more effectively to quantify uncertainty in prevalence estimates than existing approaches.
Abstract:Unlike classification, whose goal is to estimate the class of each data point, quantification (or prevalence estimation) aims to estimate the distribution of classes in a dataset. An important task in prevalence estimation is to quantify the uncertainty in prevalence estimates. In this paper, we introduce Precise Quantifier (PQ), a Bayesian aggregative quantifier that achieves narrow prediction intervals with sufficient coverage (i.e., sufficient proportion of intervals containing the true prevalence). We find that PQ produces more precise prevalence estimates than existing methods as the discriminative power of the underlying classifier increases and as the validation-to-test size ratio increases. These empirical results suggest that PQ uses validation information more effectively to quantify uncertainty in prevalence estimates than existing approaches.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2507.06061 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2507.06061v2 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.06061 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 213 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
OCT-FedSIR: Toward Trustworthy Federated Ophthalmic Learning under Annotation Noise
arXiv · 16 sept. 2026

Seeing beyond BMI: Estimating cardiometabolic risk with smartphone imagery
Google Research · 17 aug. 2026

Researchers Simulate Molecules with Hybrid Hpc-Quantum Embedding
Quantum Zeitgeist · 28 aug. 2026
Model Weight Profiles: Where Do the Parameters Go?
AMD · 25 sept. 2026