Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This research addresses the critical challenge of semantic coordinate drift in autonomous agents by introducing "epistemic memory," a mechanism that tracks the validity conditions of stored knowledge rather than just its content. The authors formalize a dynamic epistemic quotient to prove unavoidable errors in fixed representations across changing environments and propose Observable Belief Memory (OBM) to preserve hypothesis provenance. These findings suggest that future robust AI systems must explicitly reason about the evolving applicability of their internal representations as sensor capabilities or observation contexts shift.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Epistemic Memory: A Validity Layer for Self-Maintaining Intelligent Systems

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2510.16899v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: AI memory mechanisms primarily focus on preserving information content, often neglecting the validity conditions under which knowledge remains applicable, leading to semantic coordinate drift when agents move, change sensors, or encounter novel environments. This paper proposes epistemic memory as a validity-maintenance layer that governs when stored knowledge remains applicable. We formalize the dynamic epistemic quotient, an observation-induced equivalence structure over hypotheses that evolves with an agent's interaction history and sensing capabilities. We derive a pairwise incompatibility lower bound showing that any fixed semantic representation must incur unavoidable error across changing epistemic boundaries. We further identify a failure mode under symmetric crossing quotients, where overlap-based class-level transport becomes independent of pre-transition belief, motivating preservation of within-class hypothesis provenance. We introduce Observable Belief Memory (OBM) as a constructive epistemic governance architecture, combining the current epistemic quotient, belief over quotient classes, and within-class provenance through a posterior-consistent update. Controlled experiments demonstrate that explicit epistemic tracking improves robustness under changing observation conditions, particularly when class-level correspondence becomes insufficient. These results suggest that self-maintaining intelligent systems may benefit from reasoning not only about hidden states, but also about the evolving validity of the representations through which those states become knowable.

Abstract:AI memory mechanisms primarily focus on preserving information content, often neglecting the validity conditions under which knowledge remains applicable, leading to semantic coordinate drift when agents move, change sensors, or encounter novel environments. This paper proposes epistemic memory as a validity-maintenance layer that governs when stored knowledge remains applicable. We formalize the dynamic epistemic quotient, an observation-induced equivalence structure over hypotheses that evolves with an agent's interaction history and sensing capabilities. We derive a pairwise incompatibility lower bound showing that any fixed semantic representation must incur unavoidable error across changing epistemic boundaries. We further identify a failure mode under symmetric crossing quotients, where overlap-based class-level transport becomes independent of pre-transition belief, motivating preservation of within-class hypothesis provenance. We introduce Observable Belief Memory (OBM) as a constructive epistemic governance architecture, combining the current epistemic quotient, belief over quotient classes, and within-class provenance through a posterior-consistent update. Controlled experiments demonstrate that explicit epistemic tracking improves robustness under changing observation conditions, particularly when class-level correspondence becomes insufficient. These results suggest that self-maintaining intelligent systems may benefit from reasoning not only about hidden states, but also about the evolving validity of the representations through which those states become knowable.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2510.16899 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2510.16899v2 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.16899 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 290 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe