analiza aiqbench
This research addresses a critical misalignment in post-training large language models for verifiable tasks like math reasoning and code generation, where standard cross-entropy loss fails to optimize for verifier acceptance. The authors propose entropy-regularized cross-entropy as a tractable proxy that prevents probability mass from leaking into unsupported incorrect outputs, consistently improving accuracy on benchmarks. This work offers a practical methodological correction for imitation-based training pipelines in domains with multiple valid solutions.
Entropy Regularization: A Free Correction to Cross-Entropy for Verified Demonstrations
arXiv:2609.30572v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are often post-trained on expert demonstrations using cross-entropy (CE), even when the downstream objective is not to imitate the demonstrated solution but to produce any output accepted by a verifier. This mismatch is seen in verifiable domains with multiple correct solutions, such as mathematical reasoning and code generation, where training data may contain only one expert solution per problem. We show that minimizing cross-entropy can be misaligned with minimizing verifier risk; two policies can assign identical likelihood to the observed demonstrations while placing different probability mass on incorrect outputs. This is formalized through a learning-theoretic counterexample in which CE minimization selects a suboptimal policy. We identify that controlling the support of the learned policy can solve this problem by preventing probability mass from spreading to unsupported outputs. Since support size is non-differentiable and computationally intractable, we propose entropy-regularized cross-entropy (ER-CE), using token-level Shannon entropy as a tractable proxy. Finally, across mathematical reasoning and code-generation benchmarks, we find that entropy-regularized training consistently improves verifier accuracy over standard cross-entropy. Our results identify a simple failure mode of imitation-based post-training in verifiable tasks and provide a practical objective that is better aligned with producing correct outputs.
Abstract:Large language models are often post-trained on expert demonstrations using cross-entropy (CE), even when the downstream objective is not to imitate the demonstrated solution but to produce any output accepted by a verifier. This mismatch is seen in verifiable domains with multiple correct solutions, such as mathematical reasoning and code generation, where training data may contain only one expert solution per problem. We show that minimizing cross-entropy can be misaligned with minimizing verifier risk; two policies can assign identical likelihood to the observed demonstrations while placing different probability mass on incorrect outputs. This is formalized through a learning-theoretic counterexample in which CE minimization selects a suboptimal policy. We identify that controlling the support of the learned policy can solve this problem by preventing probability mass from spreading to unsupported outputs. Since support size is non-differentiable and computationally intractable, we propose entropy-regularized cross-entropy (ER-CE), using token-level Shannon entropy as a tractable proxy. Finally, across mathematical reasoning and code-generation benchmarks, we find that entropy-regularized training consistently improves verifier accuracy over standard cross-entropy. Our results identify a simple failure mode of imitation-based post-training in verifiable tasks and provide a practical objective that is better aligned with producing correct outputs.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2609.30572 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.30572v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30572 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 293 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Introducing North Mini Code: Cohere’s First Model For Developers
Hugging Face · 9 iun. 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · 3 aug. 2026

A brief history of quantum vs classical computational advantage
Quantum Journal · 1 sept. 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · 30 iul. 2026