analiza aiqbench
This paper proposes SACE, a method for choosing how to partition quantum circuits before circuit cutting, so that a workload too large for one processor can be split across smaller devices. Its main claim is that a cheap entanglement-based proxy, combined with finite-bond MPS simulation checks, predicts reconstruction overhead well on small benchmarks such as QFT and QAOA. The results come from classical simulation of small and medium circuits, so readers should treat the gains as benchmark-specific evidence rather than proof of practical advantage on hardware.
Entanglement-Capability-Aware Finite-Bond Circuit Cutting for Distributed Quantum Computing
arXiv:2610.14580v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Distributed quantum computing distributes workloads that exceed a single processor's capacity across resource-constrained components. Circuit cutting enables this decomposition, but its effectiveness depends on partition choice. We present SACE, a Simulation-Aware Circuit Partitioning framework with Entanglement-Capability-Aware Screening. EP-Cost screens partitions using a parameter-dependent entanglement-capability proxy and native implementation cost. Under reconstruction constraints, finite-bond refinement selects the candidate that minimizes the worst-subcircuit discrepancy between normalized MPS simulations at bond dimensions $\chi$ and $2\chi$. Across 14 exhaustively enumerated small-scale candidate spaces, EP-Cost-guided genetic algorithm selections attain co-optimal native quasiprobability decomposition (QPD) overhead, with a median within-circuit Spearman correlation of 0.9965 between EP-Cost and QPD overhead. At matched cut counts, EP-Cost reduces QPD overhead by $25.20\times$ and $16.89\times$ for 8- and 9-qubit QFT circuits, respectively, and improves sampled reconstruction. On 12-qubit approximate QFT, deterministic reconstruction reduces Pauli-observable mean absolute error in all six low-bond conditions and total-variation distance in five. With five cuts and 7,776 QPD terms, SACE is best on all four reconstruction metrics in four of six conditions. At 24 qubits, SACE improves exact-local QFT accuracy in all 30 instance-bond-dimension conditions against each EP-Cost-only, Kernighan-Lin, and spectral baseline. The 50-qubit QFT comparisons remain favorable as reference convergence improves. Weighted QAOA circuits provide complementary, more bond-sensitive evidence. Refinement benefits persist across three search methods; larger candidate panels improve the optimized proxy without guaranteeing lower exact-local error.
Abstract:Distributed quantum computing distributes workloads that exceed a single processor's capacity across resource-constrained components. Circuit cutting enables this decomposition, but its effectiveness depends on partition choice. We present SACE, a Simulation-Aware Circuit Partitioning framework with Entanglement-Capability-Aware Screening. EP-Cost screens partitions using a parameter-dependent entanglement-capability proxy and native implementation cost. Under reconstruction constraints, finite-bond refinement selects the candidate that minimizes the worst-subcircuit discrepancy between normalized MPS simulations at bond dimensions $\chi$ and $2\chi$. Across 14 exhaustively enumerated small-scale candidate spaces, EP-Cost-guided genetic algorithm selections attain co-optimal native quasiprobability decomposition (QPD) overhead, with a median within-circuit Spearman correlation of 0.9965 between EP-Cost and QPD overhead. At matched cut counts, EP-Cost reduces QPD overhead by $25.20\times$ and $16.89\times$ for 8- and 9-qubit QFT circuits, respectively, and improves sampled reconstruction. On 12-qubit approximate QFT, deterministic reconstruction reduces Pauli-observable mean absolute error in all six low-bond conditions and total-variation distance in five. With five cuts and 7,776 QPD terms, SACE is best on all four reconstruction metrics in four of six conditions. At 24 qubits, SACE improves exact-local QFT accuracy in all 30 instance-bond-dimension conditions against each EP-Cost-only, Kernighan-Lin, and spectral baseline. The 50-qubit QFT comparisons remain favorable as reference convergence improves. Weighted QAOA circuits provide complementary, more bond-sensitive evidence. Refinement benefits persist across three search methods; larger candidate panels improve the optimized proxy without guaranteeing lower exact-local error.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2610.14580 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.14580v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14580 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 328 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Cisco’s Compiler now plans for quantum network limits
Quantum Zeitgeist · 7 oct. 2026

Photons for Reach, Atoms for Entanglement: A Compound Photon-Atom Blueprint for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing
The Quantum Insider · 6 aug. 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · 17 oct. 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026