analiza aiqbench
This research investigates how interaction formats and textual scaffolds influence the decision-making quality of LLM agents in structured environments like auctions and matching problems. The study finds that simpler, sequential interfaces significantly reduce bid deviations compared to complex ranking systems, though these behavioral improvements do not always correlate with better verbal explanations from the models. These findings offer critical insights for designing robust agent interfaces where realized choices matter more than stated strategic reasoning.
Engineering Simplicity: Simple Mechanism Interfaces Steer LLM Agents
arXiv:2609.36365v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Can interaction formats and textual scaffolds help large language model (LLM) agents make better decisions, and do better decisions come with better explanations? We study these questions in auctions and matching, multi-agent environments with explicit rules and known optimal strategies. These settings let us vary how a decision problem is presented while retaining a benchmark for evaluating behavior. Drawing on human-motivated theories of simplicity, we compare interfaces that elicit a complete bid or ranking with sequential interfaces that make safe choices easier to identify. We then hold the interaction format fixed and vary reasoning scaffolds and rule descriptions. Across four model families, the ascending auction interface substantially reduces bid deviations. The matching comparison also shows why sequential responses require different error accounting from complete rankings. Laying out payoff contingencies and explaining why truth-telling is safe also improve choices, whereas prompts to plan through matching rounds or form beliefs about opponents worsen play overall. In auctions, these behavioral gains are not accompanied by corresponding improvements in measured verbal indicators of strategic understanding in the agents' short stated plans. Other prompts change those indicators without improving bids. Our findings suggest that human-motivated theories of simplicity can inform the design of decision environments for artificial agents. They also show why scaffolds should be evaluated through realized choices as well as explanations: improvements in one need not appear in the other.
Abstract:Can interaction formats and textual scaffolds help large language model (LLM) agents make better decisions, and do better decisions come with better explanations? We study these questions in auctions and matching, multi-agent environments with explicit rules and known optimal strategies. These settings let us vary how a decision problem is presented while retaining a benchmark for evaluating behavior. Drawing on human-motivated theories of simplicity, we compare interfaces that elicit a complete bid or ranking with sequential interfaces that make safe choices easier to identify. We then hold the interaction format fixed and vary reasoning scaffolds and rule descriptions. Across four model families, the ascending auction interface substantially reduces bid deviations. The matching comparison also shows why sequential responses require different error accounting from complete rankings. Laying out payoff contingencies and explaining why truth-telling is safe also improve choices, whereas prompts to plan through matching rounds or form beliefs about opponents worsen play overall. In auctions, these behavioral gains are not accompanied by corresponding improvements in measured verbal indicators of strategic understanding in the agents' short stated plans. Other prompts change those indicators without improving bids. Our findings suggest that human-motivated theories of simplicity can inform the design of decision environments for artificial agents. They also show why scaffolds should be evaluated through realized choices as well as explanations: improvements in one need not appear in the other.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.36365 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.36365v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36365 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 321 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · 25 sept. 2026

Presentation: From OTEL to SLMs: Distilling Frontier Model Behaviour from Production Telemetry
InfoQ · 17 iul. 2026

Coding Agents Don’t Need Bigger Context Windows — They Need a Context Compiler
Towards Data Science · 1 aug. 2026

Humanity’s Last Invention — Richard Socher of Recursive
Latent Space · 14 sept. 2026