analiza aiqbench
This paper challenges the prevailing "on-the-fly" agentic paradigm by arguing that it sacrifices reliability and security for speed, effectively delivering improvised prototypes rather than production-grade systems. The authors propose integrating rigorous software engineering processes into the agentic loop to create hardened, reusable workflows via an AI Workflow Store, thereby addressing the critical flexibility-robustness tension. For a tech audience, the key takeaway is the necessity of amortizing the computational cost of rigorous testing and staged deployment to ensure agents are safe for high-stakes applications.
Engineering Robustness into Personal Agents with the AI Workflow Store
arXiv:2605.10907v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The dominant paradigm for AI agents is an "on-the-fly" loop in which agents synthesize plans and execute actions within seconds or minutes in response to user prompts. We argue that this paradigm short-circuits disciplined software engineering (SE) processes -- iterative design, rigorous testing, adversarial evaluation, staged deployment, and more -- that have delivered the (relatively) reliable and secure systems we use today. By focusing on rapid, real-time synthesis, are AI agents effectively delivering users improvised prototypes rather than systems fit for high-stakes scenarios in which users may unwittingly apply them? This paper argues for the need to integrate rigorous SE processes into the agentic loop to produce production-grade, hardened, and deterministically-constrained agent *workflows* that substantially outperform the potentially brittle and vulnerable results of on-the-fly synthesis. Doing so may require extra compute and time, and if so, we must amortize the cost of rigor through reuse across a broad user community. We envision an *AI Workflow Store* that consists of hardened and reusable workflows that agents can invoke with far greater reliability and security than improvised tool chains. We outline the research challenges of this vision, which stem from a broader flexibility-robustness tension that we argue requires moving beyond the ``on-the-fly'' paradigm to navigate effectively.
Abstract:The dominant paradigm for AI agents is an "on-the-fly" loop in which agents synthesize plans and execute actions within seconds or minutes in response to user prompts. We argue that this paradigm short-circuits disciplined software engineering (SE) processes -- iterative design, rigorous testing, adversarial evaluation, staged deployment, and more -- that have delivered the (relatively) reliable and secure systems we use today. By focusing on rapid, real-time synthesis, are AI agents effectively delivering users improvised prototypes rather than systems fit for high-stakes scenarios in which users may unwittingly apply them? This paper argues for the need to integrate rigorous SE processes into the agentic loop to produce production-grade, hardened, and deterministically-constrained agent *workflows* that substantially outperform the potentially brittle and vulnerable results of on-the-fly synthesis. Doing so may require extra compute and time, and if so, we must amortize the cost of rigor through reuse across a broad user community. We envision an *AI Workflow Store* that consists of hardened and reusable workflows that agents can invoke with far greater reliability and security than improvised tool chains. We outline the research challenges of this vision, which stem from a broader flexibility-robustness tension that we argue requires moving beyond the ``on-the-fly'' paradigm to navigate effectively.
Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2605.10907 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2605.10907v3 [cs.CR] for this version)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 219 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Robust Hamiltonian engineering with subensemble control
arXiv · 4 sept. 2026
Purcell-Engineered Hybrid Coupler for Leakage-Suppressed Robust CZ Gates
arXiv · 28 iul. 2026
Researchers map quantum engine errors with a new topological tool
Quantum Zeitgeist · 22 aug. 2026
Neural Bayesian Anomaly Mitigation: A Robust Loss that Doubles as an Unsupervised Contamination Classifier
arXiv · 16 iun. 2026