Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

În afara temei aiqbench

În afara temei aiqbench

Această știre a fost preluată de la o sursă pe care o urmărim, dar nu ține de domeniul AI sau cuantic, așa că nu există o perspectivă aiqbench pentru ea.

Encryption at rest vs. encryption in transit: What businesses need to understand

Proton Blog10 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

Learn the difference between encryption at rest and encryption in transit, why both matter, and what zero-access encryption means.

Encryption is a term every business recognizes but that few actually interrogate in conversations with potential vendors. If a provider says that it encrypts data or that it offers “bank-grade security”, these phrases sound reassuring. But they don’t actually tell you anything about the encryption itself: encrypted where, encrypted when, and encrypted how? We’ll explain the difference between encryption at rest and encryption in transit, what your business needs to know about them, and what to ask vendors when you’re approaching them. What do encryption at rest and encryption in transit mean? What do encryption at rest and encryption in transit mean? They sit in storage. They travel across networks. They’re decrypted so someone can actually use them. Each of those conditions is vulnerable to a different kind of attack, and a service can be well-protected in one condition while vulnerable in another. The two terms every business leader should understand are encryption at rest and encryption in transit. They are often mentioned together, but they do different jobs. One protects data while it is stored. The other protects data while it is moving. Both are necessary, but when you’re using encryption you have to consider who holds the keys…

Extras afișat conform termenilor RSS ai publicației · 200 cuvinte · textul integral și figurile sunt pe site-ul publicației

Subiecte conexe