Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchSiguranță AI

analiza aiqbench

This research identifies a novel attack vector where malicious instructions hidden within encoded third-party skills can successfully compromise Large Language Model agents. The study demonstrates significant attack success rates across multiple models and highlights the limitations of current skill scanners in detecting these ciphered injections. Ultimately, it underscores the critical need for robust verification mechanisms before untrusted content is decoded and executed by AI systems.
Surse care acoperăarXiv, organiser.org, LessWrong, Cybersecurity News
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Encrypted Skills Can Become New Security Exploits If AI Agents Know How to Decipher

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2610.18262v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Third-party skills can expose LLM agents to malicious instructions hidden by encoding. We introduce Ciphered Skill Injection (CSI), which embeds such instructions in skill files for agents to decode and follow. We evaluate Caesar and layered variants across eight models and 139 injection-task pairs, separating instruction recovery from attack success. In the primary setting with shortened skills, the variants achieve attack success rates of up to 47.5% and 40.3%, respectively. Successful decoding does not guarantee attack success, and layering has model-dependent effects. The tested skill scanners rarely flag injected skills. These findings highlight the risk of promoting decoded, untrusted content into actionable instructions.

Abstract:Third-party skills can expose LLM agents to malicious instructions hidden by encoding. We introduce Ciphered Skill Injection (CSI), which embeds such instructions in skill files for agents to decode and follow. We evaluate Caesar and layered variants across eight models and 139 injection-task pairs, separating instruction recovery from attack success. In the primary setting with shortened skills, the variants achieve attack success rates of up to 47.5% and 40.3%, respectively. Successful decoding does not guarantee attack success, and layering has model-dependent effects. The tested skill scanners rarely flag injected skills. These findings highlight the risk of promoting decoded, untrusted content into actionable instructions.

Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2610.18262 [cs.CR]

(or arXiv:2610.18262v1 [cs.CR] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.18262 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 205 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe