analiza aiqbench
This research introduces EmoXpt, a framework that quantifies the emotional variance between human discourse on generative AI and the responses produced by LLMs like ChatGPT. The study finds that model outputs are significantly more cohesive and consistently positive compared to human sentiment, offering new insights into the perceived emotional intelligence of current large language models.
EmoXpt: Analyzing Emotional Variances in Human Comments and LLM-Generated Responses
arXiv:2501.06597v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The widespread adoption of generative AI has generated diverse opinions, with individuals expressing both support and criticism of its applications. This study investigates the emotional dynamics surrounding generative AI by analyzing human tweets referencing terms such as ChatGPT, OpenAI, Copilot, and LLMs. To further understand the emotional intelligence of ChatGPT, we examine its responses to selected tweets, highlighting differences in sentiment between human comments and LLM-generated responses. We introduce EmoXpt, a sentiment analysis framework designed to assess both human perspectives on generative AI and the sentiment embedded in ChatGPT's responses. Unlike prior studies that focus exclusively on human sentiment, EmoXpt uniquely evaluates the emotional expression of ChatGPT. Experimental results demonstrate that LLM-generated responses are notably more efficient, cohesive, and consistently positive than human responses.
Abstract:The widespread adoption of generative AI has generated diverse opinions, with individuals expressing both support and criticism of its applications. This study investigates the emotional dynamics surrounding generative AI by analyzing human tweets referencing terms such as ChatGPT, OpenAI, Copilot, and LLMs. To further understand the emotional intelligence of ChatGPT, we examine its responses to selected tweets, highlighting differences in sentiment between human comments and LLM-generated responses. We introduce EmoXpt, a sentiment analysis framework designed to assess both human perspectives on generative AI and the sentiment embedded in ChatGPT's responses. Unlike prior studies that focus exclusively on human sentiment, EmoXpt uniquely evaluates the emotional expression of ChatGPT. Experimental results demonstrate that LLM-generated responses are notably more efficient, cohesive, and consistently positive than human responses.
7 pages, 10 figures, 5 tables. This paper has been accepted and presented at the 2025 IEEE 15th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC)
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
arXiv:2501.06597 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2501.06597v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 171 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · 6 aug. 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · 17 oct. 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · 24 sept. 2026