analiza aiqbench
EBench introduces a granular diagnostic framework for generalist mobile manipulation models, moving beyond simple success rates to evaluate specific capability and generalization dimensions. The benchmark reveals distinct trade-offs among state-of-the-art policies like $\pi_{0.5}$ and InternVLA-A1, highlighting how high overall scores can mask weaknesses in dexterity or robustness against distribution shifts. This tool provides essential signals for researchers aiming to iterate on foundational models that bridge mobile navigation with complex manipulation tasks.
EBench: Elemental Diagnosis of Generalist Mobile Manipulation Policies
arXiv:2606.18239v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present EBench, a simulation benchmark that diagnoses generalist mobile manipulation policies beyond a single success-rate scalar. EBench comprises 26 diverse and challenging manipulation tasks annotated along 5 capability dimensions and 4 generalization dimensions. We evaluate state-of-the-art generalist manipulation models including $\pi_0$, $\pi_{0.5}$, XVLA, and InternVLA-A1, and reveal that models with near success rates exhibit strikingly different capability profiles: $\pi_{0.5}$ achieves the highest test success rate and the best train--test retention, whereas InternVLA-A1 dominates mobile manipulation but collapses on dexterous tasks, and XVLA exhibits strengths on a disjoint set of atomic skills compared to other policies. Beyond capability profiling, EBench analyzes the generalization ability from 4 representative perspectives, identifying the impact of different distribution shift factors. The results reveal strengths and weaknesses of models behind an overall score. We hope this benchmark offers a broad set of diagnostic signals to guide iteration on generalist manipulation models.
Abstract:We present EBench, a simulation benchmark that diagnoses generalist mobile manipulation policies beyond a single success-rate scalar. EBench comprises 26 diverse and challenging manipulation tasks annotated along 5 capability dimensions and 4 generalization dimensions. We evaluate state-of-the-art generalist manipulation models including $\pi_0$, $\pi_{0.5}$, XVLA, and InternVLA-A1, and reveal that models with near success rates exhibit strikingly different capability profiles: $\pi_{0.5}$ achieves the highest test success rate and the best train--test retention, whereas InternVLA-A1 dominates mobile manipulation but collapses on dexterous tasks, and XVLA exhibits strengths on a disjoint set of atomic skills compared to other policies. Beyond capability profiling, EBench analyzes the generalization ability from 4 representative perspectives, identifying the impact of different distribution shift factors. The results reveal strengths and weaknesses of models behind an overall score. We hope this benchmark offers a broad set of diagnostic signals to guide iteration on generalist manipulation models.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2606.18239 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2606.18239v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.18239 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 163 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
EBench: Elemental Diagnosis of Generalist Mobile Manipulation Policies
arXiv · 11 sept. 2026
Cracking Mobile Manipulation: From Failure Diagnosis to Agentic Robot System
arXiv · 15 oct. 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · 7 iun. 2026
ManiUnit: A Manipulation Skill Dataset and Benchmark for Long-Horizon Tasks
arXiv · 9 oct. 2026