analiza aiqbench
DyCon addresses the "overthinking" inefficiency in Large Reasoning Models by dynamically adjusting reasoning depth based on evolving task difficulty encoded in step-level embeddings. This training-free approach significantly reduces redundant computation steps across various model sizes and benchmarks while maintaining accuracy and generalization. The method offers a practical, no-cost optimization for improving the efficiency of existing reasoning workflows without requiring task-specific retraining.
DyCon: Dynamic Reasoning Control via Evolving Difficulty Modeling
arXiv:2606.07108v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) demonstrate remarkable performance improvements by iteratively reflecting, exploring, and executing complex tasks, yet suffer from inefficiencies due to redundant reasoning, known as "overthinking". Existing methods to mitigate this issue either rely on static difficulty estimates or require task-specific training, and thus fail to adapt to the dynamic complexity during reasoning. In this work, we empirically show that the problem difficulty evolves dynamically throughout the reasoning process and is linearly encoded in the LRM's step-level embeddings. Building on this insight, we propose DyCon, a training-free framework that leverages latent step-level representations to explicitly model the evolving task difficulty, enabling the dynamic control of reasoning depth to mitigate the overthinking issue. Extensive experiments conducted on four models ranging from 4B to 32B, and across twelve benchmarks in math reasoning, general question answering, and coding tasks demonstrate that DyCon significantly enhances reasoning efficiency by reducing redundant steps without sacrificing accuracy or generalization. Project page and code are available at https://github.com/yu-lin-li/DyCon.
Abstract:Recent advances in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) demonstrate remarkable performance improvements by iteratively reflecting, exploring, and executing complex tasks, yet suffer from inefficiencies due to redundant reasoning, known as "overthinking". Existing methods to mitigate this issue either rely on static difficulty estimates or require task-specific training, and thus fail to adapt to the dynamic complexity during reasoning. In this work, we empirically show that the problem difficulty evolves dynamically throughout the reasoning process and is linearly encoded in the LRM's step-level embeddings. Building on this insight, we propose DyCon, a training-free framework that leverages latent step-level representations to explicitly model the evolving task difficulty, enabling the dynamic control of reasoning depth to mitigate the overthinking issue. Extensive experiments conducted on four models ranging from 4B to 32B, and across twelve benchmarks in math reasoning, general question answering, and coding tasks demonstrate that DyCon significantly enhances reasoning efficiency by reducing redundant steps without sacrificing accuracy or generalization. Project page and code are available at this https URL.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2606.07108 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2606.07108v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.07108 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 260 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
DyCon: Dynamic Reasoning Control via Evolving Difficulty Modeling
arXiv · 9 iun. 2026

AXRP Episode 50 - Eli Lifland on AI 2027
LessWrong · 3 aug. 2026

A proposal for better informing the public about loss-of-control risks from frontier AI development
METR · 14 oct. 2026
Don't Overthink, Don't Underthink: Toward Adaptive Reasoning in Agentic AI
arXiv · 28 aug. 2026