Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This research advances signal processing by integrating Proximal Policy Optimization to adaptively denoise network traffic under statistical drift, directly enhancing the reliability of anomaly detection and capacity estimation. By optimizing a wavelet-based preprocessing layer specifically for downstream utility rather than reconstruction fidelity, the method addresses critical limitations in static filtering approaches where noise obscures transient load bursts. The work represents a significant step toward robust AI-driven monitoring systems capable of maintaining accuracy despite non-stationary environmental conditions.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Drift-Aware RL-based Wavelet Denoising for Network-Traffic Anomaly Detection

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2607.20011v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Traffic-utilisation measurements for network monitoring are corrupted by additive noise and statistical drift: time-dependent change in the signal's mean, variance, distributional shape, or tail behaviour. Static wavelet denoising, calibrated under stationary independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) Gaussian assumptions, becomes mismatched under drift and, at moderate-to-high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), over-suppresses useful structure and degrades monitoring decisions. We propose a drift-aware framework treating adaptive wavelet denoising as a preprocessing layer optimised for two tasks: anomaly detection, recovering the multi-scale transient load bursts that noise and drift obscure, and capacity estimation, recovering the operational required capacity $C_{95}$ (95th percentile of utilisation). Because localised bursts are multi-scale structure a wavelet preserves but a low-pass filter removes, detection discriminates denoiser families. A four-detector gate (Page-Hinkley, variance-ratio, Jensen-Shannon, Anderson-Darling) determines when to invoke a learned policy, and a Proximal Policy Optimization agent selects a per-window wavelet configuration over a mixed discrete-continuous action space. Unlike prior work, the reward is downstream task utility, not reconstruction fidelity. The denoiser is benchmarked, per drift type and input SNR, against a low-pass moving-average filter, VisuShrink, SureShrink, BayesShrink, and a Wiener filter. Defining the anomaly target on the clean signal and the drift gate on the corruption keeps both stages non-circular.

Abstract:Traffic-utilisation measurements for network monitoring are corrupted by additive noise and statistical drift: time-dependent change in the signal's mean, variance, distributional shape, or tail behaviour. Static wavelet denoising, calibrated under stationary independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) Gaussian assumptions, becomes mismatched under drift and, at moderate-to-high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), over-suppresses useful structure and degrades monitoring decisions. We propose a drift-aware framework treating adaptive wavelet denoising as a preprocessing layer optimised for two tasks: anomaly detection, recovering the multi-scale transient load bursts that noise and drift obscure, and capacity estimation, recovering the operational required capacity $C_{95}$ (95th percentile of utilisation). Because localised bursts are multi-scale structure a wavelet preserves but a low-pass filter removes, detection discriminates denoiser families. A four-detector gate (Page-Hinkley, variance-ratio, Jensen-Shannon, Anderson-Darling) determines when to invoke a learned policy, and a Proximal Policy Optimization agent selects a per-window wavelet configuration over a mixed discrete-continuous action space. Unlike prior work, the reward is downstream task utility, not reconstruction fidelity. The denoiser is benchmarked, per drift type and input SNR, against a low-pass moving-average filter, VisuShrink, SureShrink, BayesShrink, and a Wiener filter. Defining the anomaly target on the clean signal and the drift gate on the corruption keeps both stages non-circular.

Submitted to IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications. This version has not yet undergone peer review

Signal Processing (eess.SP); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2607.20011 [eess.SP]

(or arXiv:2607.20011v1 [eess.SP] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.20011 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 312 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe