Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

Dr-CiK introduces a critical benchmark for evaluating AI agents' ability to autonomously retrieve, filter, and utilize external context for time series forecasting from noisy data sources. The study reveals that current deep research methods often struggle to distinguish relevant evidence from distractors, sometimes degrading forecast accuracy when relying on retrieved information. This work highlights the urgent need for robust agent architectures capable of active context discovery to improve real-world predictive modeling.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Dr-CiK: A Benchmark testing Deep Research for Context-Aided Forecasting

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2605.27904v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Time series forecasting in real-world settings often depends not only on historical observations, but also on external context that must be actively discovered from noisy, heterogeneous information sources. Yet existing context-aided forecasting benchmarks typically assume that the supporting context is already provided, leaving open whether agents can identify it on their own. Therefore, we introduce Dr-CiK, a benchmark for evaluating whether agents can retrieve forecasting-relevant supporting context from a document corpus, filter out distractors, distill the retrieved context into forecast-useful evidence, and generate forecasts supported by that evidence. Through context ablations and evaluations of state-of-the-art deep research and forecasting methods paired together, we show that high-quality context substantially improves forecasting performance in Dr-CiK. However, existing DR methods recover limited ground-truth supporting evidence, are frequently misled by distractors, and can cause forecasters to perform worse with retrieved context than without context. Our results motivate research on agents that search for the right context to predict the future.

Abstract:Time series forecasting in real-world settings often depends not only on historical observations, but also on external context that must be actively discovered from noisy, heterogeneous information sources. Yet existing context-aided forecasting benchmarks typically assume that the supporting context is already provided, leaving open whether agents can identify it on their own. Therefore, we introduce Dr-CiK, a benchmark for evaluating whether agents can retrieve forecasting-relevant supporting context from a document corpus, filter out distractors, distill the retrieved context into forecast-useful evidence, and generate forecasts supported by that evidence. Through context ablations and evaluations of state-of-the-art deep research and forecasting methods paired together, we show that high-quality context substantially improves forecasting performance in Dr-CiK. However, existing DR methods recover limited ground-truth supporting evidence, are frequently misled by distractors, and can cause forecasters to perform worse with retrieved context than without context. Our results motivate research on agents that search for the right context to predict the future.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2605.27904 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2605.27904v2 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27904 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 251 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe