analiza aiqbench
The paper introduces GAMBLe, a framework that decomposes AI-Driven Research Systems into specific parameters to demonstrate that standard convergence guarantees fail under these complex interactions. Empirical results across 760+ runs indicate that frontier models do not universally outperform open-source alternatives and that simple mechanisms can sometimes exceed state-of-the-art meta-search methods. This analysis suggests that optimizing ADRS requires careful component selection rather than relying on assumed hierarchies of model capability.
Don't Gamble, GAMBLe: An Analytical Framework for AI-Driven Research Systems
arXiv:2606.02863v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI-Driven Research Systems (ADRS) -- systems coupling LLMs with automated evaluation to discover algorithms, proofs, and designs -- are being optimized and adopted across domains, but the tools to analyze them have not kept pace. ADRS performance depends on component interactions that are poorly understood, expensive to explore, and (as we show) not well captured by standard convergence guarantees. These guarantees rely on structural assumptions that do not hold under the ADRS process we formalize. We introduce GAMBLe, a framework that decomposes ADRS behavior into four parameters (generator $G$, assessor $\mathcal{A}$, discovery mechanism $\mathcal{M}$, budget $B$) and one compositional object, the effective landscape $L_{\text{eff}} = \mathcal{A} \circ G$, which reveals that distinct generator-assessor pairs induce structurally different per-problem optimization landscapes. We exercise the framework on 760+ replicated runs (>46,000 iterations) spanning generators from single LLMs to dynamically-adaptive ensembles, mechanisms from greedy selection to co-evolutionary meta-search, and three NP-hard problems whose assessors range from continuous scoring to cliff functions. The experiments reveal no total ordering of generators or mechanisms: frontier models can underperform open-source alternatives and the simplest mechanism sometimes outperforms state-of-the-art meta-search. Results show that even under limited budgets (60 iterations per run), the right component choices can improve performance by 13-67% and search efficiency by 6-39x.
Abstract:AI-Driven Research Systems (ADRS) -- systems coupling LLMs with automated evaluation to discover algorithms, proofs, and designs -- are being optimized and adopted across domains, but the tools to analyze them have not kept pace. ADRS performance depends on component interactions that are poorly understood, expensive to explore, and (as we show) not well captured by standard convergence guarantees. These guarantees rely on structural assumptions that do not hold under the ADRS process we formalize. We introduce GAMBLe, a framework that decomposes ADRS behavior into four parameters (generator $G$, assessor $\mathcal{A}$, discovery mechanism $\mathcal{M}$, budget $B$) and one compositional object, the effective landscape $L_{\text{eff}} = \mathcal{A} \circ G$, which reveals that distinct generator-assessor pairs induce structurally different per-problem optimization landscapes. We exercise the framework on 760+ replicated runs (>46,000 iterations) spanning generators from single LLMs to dynamically-adaptive ensembles, mechanisms from greedy selection to co-evolutionary meta-search, and three NP-hard problems whose assessors range from continuous scoring to cliff functions. The experiments reveal no total ordering of generators or mechanisms: frontier models can underperform open-source alternatives and the simplest mechanism sometimes outperforms state-of-the-art meta-search. Results show that even under limited budgets (60 iterations per run), the right component choices can improve performance by 13-67% and search efficiency by 6-39x.
Preprint. 21 pages (10 main, 11 appendix). 6 figures (2 in main, 4 in appendix)
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
I.2.8; I.2.6; I.2.4; I.2.11; G.1.6; F.2.2
arXiv:2606.02863 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2606.02863v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.02863 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 322 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

News
Quantum Computing Report · 7 iun. 2026

Databricks announces 2026 global partner awards
Databricks · 15 iun. 2026

Sharif University Researchers Detail New Complexity Growth Methods
Quantum Zeitgeist · 14 iul. 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · 24 sept. 2026