Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This research demonstrates that shallow physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) can outperform deeper architectures when paired with the Levenberg-Marquardt optimization algorithm and analytical Jacobians. By reducing parameter count while maintaining high accuracy on complex PDEs, the study highlights a significant efficiency gain for solving forward and inverse problems in scientific computing. The findings suggest that architectural depth is not always necessary if second-order optimization strategies are effectively utilized.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Do physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) need to be deep? Shallow PINNs using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2602.08515v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This work investigates shallow physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for solving forward and inverse problems governed by nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs). By formulating PINN training as a nonlinear least-squares problem, the Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) algorithm is used to efficiently optimize the network parameters. Exact analytical expressions for neural-network derivatives with respect to the input variables are derived, revealing the relationships between the network output and its spatial and temporal derivatives and providing a clearer interpretation of the PINN architecture. These expressions are then used to derive explicit formulas for the Jacobian matrix required by LM. The proposed approach is evaluated on the Burgers, Schr\"odinger, Allen-Cahn, and three-dimensional Bratu equations. Numerical results show that LM substantially outperforms BFGS, L-BFGS, and Adam in convergence speed, accuracy, and final loss values. Comparisons with deeper networks further demonstrate that shallow LM-PINNs can achieve higher accuracy with substantially fewer parameters, emphasizing the importance of considering network architecture and optimization strategy jointly. The explicit analytical Jacobian also provides computational and memory advantages that are particularly relevant to large-scale PINNs. Overall, these results suggest that, for a broad class of PDEs, shallow PINNs combined with effective second-order optimization can provide accurate and computationally efficient solutions to both forward and inverse problems.

Title:Do physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) need to be deep? Shallow PINNs using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm

Abstract:This work investigates shallow physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for solving forward and inverse problems governed by nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs). By formulating PINN training as a nonlinear least-squares problem, the Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) algorithm is used to efficiently optimize the network parameters. Exact analytical expressions for neural-network derivatives with respect to the input variables are derived, revealing the relationships between the network output and its spatial and temporal derivatives and providing a clearer interpretation of the PINN architecture. These expressions are then used to derive explicit formulas for the Jacobian matrix required by LM. The proposed approach is evaluated on the Burgers, Schrödinger, Allen-Cahn, and three-dimensional Bratu equations. Numerical results show that LM substantially outperforms BFGS, L-BFGS, and Adam in convergence speed, accuracy, and final loss values. Comparisons with deeper networks further demonstrate that shallow LM-PINNs can achieve higher accuracy with substantially fewer parameters, emphasizing the importance of considering network architecture and optimization strategy jointly. The explicit analytical Jacobian also provides computational and memory advantages that are particularly relevant to large-scale PINNs. Overall, these results suggest that, for a broad class of PDEs, shallow PINNs combined with effective second-order optimization can provide accurate and computationally efficient solutions to both forward and inverse problems.

Numerical Analysis (math.NA); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE); Optimization and Control (math.OC)

arXiv:2602.08515 [math.NA]

(or arXiv:2602.08515v3 [math.NA] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.08515 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 322 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe