analiza aiqbench
This study investigates whether geometry-aware positional encodings enhance Transformer performance in spatial imperfect-information games, specifically focusing on belief estimation and hidden-entity tracking. While the proposed HexRoPE method significantly improves posterior cross-entropy and policy action accuracy during imitation tasks, it fails to translate these representation gains into higher aggregate win rates against legacy opponents. The findings suggest that incorporating geometric inductive bias aids data-efficient learning but does not automatically ensure superior closed-loop gameplay performance.
Do Geometry-Aware Positional Encodings Help Transformers in Spatial Imperfect-Information Games?
arXiv:2608.14982v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Transformers applied to spatial imperfect-information games must represent map geometry while tracking hidden entities through time. We ask whether geometry-aware positional encodings improve these capabilities, without claiming a new positional encoding. We construct a four-level benchmark on a hexagonal naval pursuit game: controlled geometry and topology probes, an exact-Bayes hidden-target tracking task, offline policy imitation at 1k and 10k games, and 7,200 fixed-seed games against three legacy opponents. Across matched Transformer backbones, HexRoPE reduces exact-belief posterior cross-entropy relative to no positional encoding by 0.278 on D6-transformed test orbits and 0.329 on a larger map; both hierarchical-bootstrap confidence intervals exclude zero, and both Holm-adjusted p-values are below 0.001. At 1k games, HexRoPE improves policy action accuracy by 4.63 percentage points over no encoding and 2.05 points over rectangular relative bias; the gains shrink to 1.55 and 0.41 points at 10k games. However, HexRoPE does not improve aggregate gameplay win rate: its paired effect over no encoding is -1.56 percentage points (95% CI [-4.50, 1.17]). Rectangular relative bias is strongest on D6 belief consistency but fails sharply when extrapolating from radius 3 to radius 4, while graph bias provides only a small blocked-edge gain. The results show that geometric inductive bias improves belief estimation and data-efficient imitation, but those representation gains do not automatically produce stronger closed-loop play.
Title:Do Geometry-Aware Positional Encodings Help Transformers in Spatial Imperfect-Information Games?
Abstract:Transformers applied to spatial imperfect-information games must represent map geometry while tracking hidden entities through time. We ask whether geometry-aware positional encodings improve these capabilities, without claiming a new positional encoding. We construct a four-level benchmark on a hexagonal naval pursuit game: controlled geometry and topology probes, an exact-Bayes hidden-target tracking task, offline policy imitation at 1k and 10k games, and 7,200 fixed-seed games against three legacy opponents. Across matched Transformer backbones, HexRoPE reduces exact-belief posterior cross-entropy relative to no positional encoding by 0.278 on D6-transformed test orbits and 0.329 on a larger map; both hierarchical-bootstrap confidence intervals exclude zero, and both Holm-adjusted p-values are below 0.001. At 1k games, HexRoPE improves policy action accuracy by 4.63 percentage points over no encoding and 2.05 points over rectangular relative bias; the gains shrink to 1.55 and 0.41 points at 10k games. However, HexRoPE does not improve aggregate gameplay win rate: its paired effect over no encoding is -1.56 percentage points (95% CI [-4.50, 1.17]). Rectangular relative bias is strongest on D6 belief consistency but fails sharply when extrapolating from radius 3 to radius 4, while graph bias provides only a small blocked-edge gain. The results show that geometric inductive bias improves belief estimation and data-efficient imitation, but those representation gains do not automatically produce stronger closed-loop play.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2608.14982 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.14982v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14982 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 326 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · 8 oct. 2026
Geometry-Aware Reinforcement Learning for 2D Irregular Nesting
arXiv · 10 iun. 2026
A Hybrid Kinematic GCN and Elastic Transformer for Efficient Indian Sign Language Recognition
arXiv · 15 oct. 2026
Running Variational Quantum Eigensolver with Qiskit Aer on AMD Instinct
AMD · 29 mai 2026