analiza aiqbench
Composing insight from the full article — this may take a moment.
Do Earnings Calls Help Predict Financial Restatements? Evaluating Text Beyond Public Firm Information
arXiv:2611.01123v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Financial restatements correct errors in previously published financial reports. Could managers' language in earnings calls warn of them in advance? Comparing 109 calls that precede restatements with 218 matched control calls, we find that the text predicts restatements but adds no detectable ranking gain beyond public firm information. A text classifier beats chance, largely because of restatements tied to special-purpose acquisition companies, but a model using only public information scores slightly higher. With refitting, the 95% interval for the gain from adding text (-0.05 to 0.11 AUROC) still leaves room for a meaningful benefit. A large language model scores higher, but we show that it names the exact ticker in 66% of masked transcripts, and it was released after the restatements occurred. Our results suggest that finding new warning signs in call text requires a public-information baseline and a check of what a language model already knows.
Title:Do Earnings Calls Help Predict Financial Restatements? Evaluating Text Beyond Public Firm Information
Abstract:Financial restatements correct errors in previously published financial reports. Could managers' language in earnings calls warn of them in advance? Comparing 109 calls that precede restatements with 218 matched control calls, we find that the text predicts restatements but adds no detectable ranking gain beyond public firm information. A text classifier beats chance, largely because of restatements tied to special-purpose acquisition companies, but a model using only public information scores slightly higher. With refitting, the 95% interval for the gain from adding text (-0.05 to 0.11 AUROC) still leaves room for a meaningful benefit. A large language model scores higher, but we show that it names the exact ticker in 66% of masked transcripts, and it was released after the restatements occurred. Our results suggest that finding new warning signs in call text requires a public-information baseline and a check of what a language model already knows.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2611.01123 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2611.01123v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.01123 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 258 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Confidence Comes from Experience: Experiential Confidence Estimation from Reasoning to Agents
arXiv · 17 sept. 2026
Reading Is Not Using: Retrieval, Judgment, and the Design of AI Financial Research Workflows
arXiv · 27 aug. 2026
Fixing banking’s omnichannel blind spot: Why the physical branch needs a digital brain
ZK Research · 15 sept. 2026
Can LLMs Be Constrained to the Past? Improving Knowledge Cutoff through Recall-Based Prompting
arXiv · 5 iun. 2026