analiza aiqbench
This research introduces the "distinguish-or-homogenize" principle for agents operating under irreversible resource depletion, formalizing how actions can alter fault model mappings rather than just searching existing ones. The proposed Risk-Budgeted Compatibility Planning (RBCP) algorithm demonstrates improved recovery feasibility in simulated microservice and navigation environments by explicitly managing worst-case failure constraints. By proving that benefits arise from changing acceptable policies rather than additional search budgets, this work advances foundational planning frameworks for robust AI systems facing degradation.
Distinguish or Homogenize: Last-Chance Policy Identification and Risk-Budgeted Recovery under Irreversible Resource Depletion
arXiv:2609.36741v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Under irreversible resource depletion, an agent can spend resources to distinguish among latent fault models, or to change the system state so that the remaining models admit a common acceptable continuation--at which point further diagnosis becomes unnecessary. This distinguish-or-homogenize principle identifies a path that existing frameworks for identification, planning, and diagnosis do not make explicit: prior formulations treat the mapping from fault models to acceptable policies as a given, whereas LCPI makes it a function of the agent's own actions. We formalize this principle through Last-Chance Policy Identification (LCPI), where correctness is evaluated at the state the agent reaches rather than at the initial state. The Last Identifiable Margin (LIM) marks the feasibility boundary between distinguishing and homogenizing. For deterministic diagnostic graphs we provide the Exact-LIM recursion; for noisy finite-horizon recovery we propose Risk-Budgeted Compatibility Planning (RBCP), which searches a compatibility-aware frontier under a hard worst-case failure constraint. Across incident recovery on abstract microservice topologies and latent-damage navigation in MiniGrid, RBCP improves risk-feasible recovery while satisfying the failure budget. A sham control--cost-matched actions that preserve model incompatibility--eliminates the gain entirely, confirming that the benefit comes from changing which policies are acceptable for which models, not from extra search or additional budget.
Abstract:Under irreversible resource depletion, an agent can spend resources to distinguish among latent fault models, or to change the system state so that the remaining models admit a common acceptable continuation--at which point further diagnosis becomes unnecessary. This distinguish-or-homogenize principle identifies a path that existing frameworks for identification, planning, and diagnosis do not make explicit: prior formulations treat the mapping from fault models to acceptable policies as a given, whereas LCPI makes it a function of the agent's own actions. We formalize this principle through Last-Chance Policy Identification (LCPI), where correctness is evaluated at the state the agent reaches rather than at the initial state. The Last Identifiable Margin (LIM) marks the feasibility boundary between distinguishing and homogenizing. For deterministic diagnostic graphs we provide the Exact-LIM recursion; for noisy finite-horizon recovery we propose Risk-Budgeted Compatibility Planning (RBCP), which searches a compatibility-aware frontier under a hard worst-case failure constraint. Across incident recovery on abstract microservice topologies and latent-damage navigation in MiniGrid, RBCP improves risk-feasible recovery while satisfying the failure budget. A sham control--cost-matched actions that preserve model incompatibility--eliminates the gain entirely, confirming that the benefit comes from changing which policies are acceptable for which models, not from extra search or additional budget.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.36741 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.36741v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36741 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 295 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · 30 iul. 2026
Tactical and Operational Exploratory Modeling for AI Governance
LessWrong · 17 iun. 2026

An unexamined cause of the OpenAI Hugging Face hacking incident: its binary performance metric
LessWrong · 23 sept. 2026