analiza aiqbench
This research addresses the critical challenge of calculating circuit distance for quantum LDPC codes, which is essential for assessing error detection capabilities in fault-tolerant architectures. The study benchmarks exact and heuristic methods to evaluate performance under realistic circuit-level noise models while introducing a new algorithm that effectively handles these complex scenarios. By releasing tools via the codeDistance Python package, the work provides practical resources for advancing quantum software stacks and hardware design.
Distance-Finding Algorithms for Quantum Codes and Circuits
arXiv:2603.22532v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The distance of a classical or quantum code is a key figure of merit which reflects its capacity to detect errors. Quantum LDPC code families have considerable promise in reducing the overhead required for fault-tolerant quantum computation, but calculating their distance is challenging with existing methods. We generally assess the performance of a quantum code under circuit level error models, and for such scenarios the circuit distance is an important consideration. Calculating circuit distance is in general more difficult than finding the distance of the corresponding code as the detector error matrix of the circuit is usually much larger than the code's check matrix. In this work, we benchmark a wide range of distance-finding methods for various classical and quantum code families, as well as syndrome-extraction circuits. We consider both exact methods (such as Brouwer-Zimmermann, connected cluster, SAT and mixed integer programming) and heuristic methods which have lower run-time but can only give a bound on distance (examples include random information set, syndrome decoder algorithms, and Stim undetectable error methods). We further develop the QDistEvol algorithm and show that it performs well for the quantum LDPC codes in our benchmark. The algorithms and test data have been made available to the community in the codeDistance Python package.
Abstract:The distance of a classical or quantum code is a key figure of merit which reflects its capacity to detect errors. Quantum LDPC code families have considerable promise in reducing the overhead required for fault-tolerant quantum computation, but calculating their distance is challenging with existing methods. We generally assess the performance of a quantum code under circuit level error models, and for such scenarios the circuit distance is an important consideration. Calculating circuit distance is in general more difficult than finding the distance of the corresponding code as the detector error matrix of the circuit is usually much larger than the code's check matrix. In this work, we benchmark a wide range of distance-finding methods for various classical and quantum code families, as well as syndrome-extraction circuits. We consider both exact methods (such as Brouwer-Zimmermann, connected cluster, SAT and mixed integer programming) and heuristic methods which have lower run-time but can only give a bound on distance (examples include random information set, syndrome decoder algorithms, and Stim undetectable error methods). We further develop the QDistEvol algorithm and show that it performs well for the quantum LDPC codes in our benchmark. The algorithms and test data have been made available to the community in the codeDistance Python package.
arXiv:2603.22532 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2603.22532v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.22532 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 296 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026

NISQ, What Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Means
Quantum Zeitgeist · 30 aug. 2026

Inside D-Wave’s Dual-Rail Qubit Roadmap and the New Haven Bet on Logical Qubits
Quantum Zeitgeist · 11 oct. 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · 15 aug. 2026