Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This paper is primarily a machine learning study: a classifier trained on pre-2019 drug-disease program data is evaluated on later programs, with a pairwise accuracy of about 75% and a disease-ranking hit rate of 61.3% versus 40.7% at random. The results are retrospective and come from a single temporal split, and the cohort was reconstructed from public registry data, so label quality and selection bias matter. Readers should treat it as evidence of signal in public pre-trial data, not as validated decision support for drug development.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Disease-level drug approval forecasting from trial-agnostic public data

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2610.14013v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Drug development is an expensive and lengthy process requiring developers to select drugs for human trials and diseases to target. Computational tools that can estimate before testing which drug-disease candidates are most likely to reach FDA approval could reduce development time and costs through early program advancement and disease prioritization. Yet existing approaches predict outcomes at a single level or stage or do not distinguish between disease outcomes for the same drug. We ask (1) whether FDA approval can be forecast for a drug-disease pair using only pre-clinical trial information, and (2) whether these forecasts can help prioritize diseases for the same drug. We built a cohort of 14,134 drug-disease pairs by reconstructing programs from ClinicalTrials.gov, extracting disease-level approvals from FDA label documentation, and enriching each pair with molecular, disease, ADMET, target, and pathway features. We divided the cohort into pre- and post-2019 programs and trained a classifier on pre-2019 data to predict FDA approval. On the post-2019 cohort (2,637 programs), the model would have prioritized a program that ultimately gained approval over one that did not approximately three out of four times. For drugs tested across multiple diseases, selecting the model's highest-ranked disease would have identified an ultimately approved disease 61.3% of the time, compared with 40.7% under random selection. These results show that public pre-trial information contains signal for forecasting FDA approval at the drug-disease level and can help prioritize diseases for the same drug. We provide a public web tool for SMILES- and ICD-10-based drug-disease approval forecasting.

Abstract:Drug development is an expensive and lengthy process requiring developers to select drugs for human trials and diseases to target. Computational tools that can estimate before testing which drug-disease candidates are most likely to reach FDA approval could reduce development time and costs through early program advancement and disease prioritization. Yet existing approaches predict outcomes at a single level or stage or do not distinguish between disease outcomes for the same drug. We ask (1) whether FDA approval can be forecast for a drug-disease pair using only pre-clinical trial information, and (2) whether these forecasts can help prioritize diseases for the same drug. We built a cohort of 14,134 drug-disease pairs by reconstructing programs from this http URL, extracting disease-level approvals from FDA label documentation, and enriching each pair with molecular, disease, ADMET, target, and pathway features. We divided the cohort into pre- and post-2019 programs and trained a classifier on pre-2019 data to predict FDA approval. On the post-2019 cohort (2,637 programs), the model would have prioritized a program that ultimately gained approval over one that did not approximately three out of four times. For drugs tested across multiple diseases, selecting the model's highest-ranked disease would have identified an ultimately approved disease 61.3% of the time, compared with 40.7% under random selection. These results show that public pre-trial information contains signal for forecasting FDA approval at the drug-disease level and can help prioritize diseases for the same drug. We provide a public web tool for SMILES- and ICD-10-based drug-disease approval forecasting.

Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.14013 [q-bio.QM]

(or arXiv:2610.14013v1 [q-bio.QM] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14013 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 349 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe