analiza aiqbench
This research addresses a critical bottleneck in RNA structure prediction by demonstrating that differentiable normalization algorithms can replace ad hoc downstream extraction steps, thereby improving the congruence between training and inference. The proposed Symmetric Doubly Stochastic Matrix (SDSM) method outperforms traditional baselines and offers a tractable, inline solution for deep learning models aiming to output base-pairing probabilities directly. By aligning the optimization objective with the final extraction logic, this work provides a more robust framework for biological sequence analysis within the machine learning domain.
Differentiable RNA Secondary Structure Extraction for Deep Learning
arXiv:2609.30752v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many deep learning approaches to RNA secondary structure prediction have recently been proposed. They typically output a weight matrix $W$ where $W_{ij}$ is an arbitrary weight for base $i$ pairing with base $j$. Converting this matrix to a predicted secondary structure or base-pairing probability matrix typically involves ad hoc and problematic downstream algorithms. Despite the importance of this conversion step, which we refer to as structure extraction, it has received relatively little attention in the literature. In this work, we analyze how the congruence between training and extraction methods affects prediction performance. To do this, we compare four extraction algorithms: a Nussinov-like dynamic programming method, maximum-weight graph matching and the greedy extraction algorithms used by SPOT-RNA and RiNALMo. These are evaluated on outputs from the pretrained RiNALMo model and three toy models trained in this paper: a differentiable Nussinov-like model, a binary cross-entropy (BCE) baseline, and a model that incorporates a novel symmetric doubly stochastic matrix (SDSM) normalization algorithm during training which allows it to output base-pairing probability matrices directly, without a separate extraction step. This SDSM normalization algorithm is differentiable and can be added inline to any deep learning model during training and evaluation. We find that the performance of each extraction method depends strongly on how the corresponding model was trained. Considering the toy models themselves, the SDSM model showed the strongest overall performance: it outperformed the BCE baseline under all four extraction algorithms and produced pre-extraction outputs closest to the ground truth. These results suggest that SDSM normalization is a tractable alternative to traditional structure extraction.
Abstract:Many deep learning approaches to RNA secondary structure prediction have recently been proposed. They typically output a weight matrix $W$ where $W_{ij}$ is an arbitrary weight for base $i$ pairing with base $j$. Converting this matrix to a predicted secondary structure or base-pairing probability matrix typically involves ad hoc and problematic downstream algorithms. Despite the importance of this conversion step, which we refer to as structure extraction, it has received relatively little attention in the literature. In this work, we analyze how the congruence between training and extraction methods affects prediction performance. To do this, we compare four extraction algorithms: a Nussinov-like dynamic programming method, maximum-weight graph matching and the greedy extraction algorithms used by SPOT-RNA and RiNALMo. These are evaluated on outputs from the pretrained RiNALMo model and three toy models trained in this paper: a differentiable Nussinov-like model, a binary cross-entropy (BCE) baseline, and a model that incorporates a novel symmetric doubly stochastic matrix (SDSM) normalization algorithm during training which allows it to output base-pairing probability matrices directly, without a separate extraction step. This SDSM normalization algorithm is differentiable and can be added inline to any deep learning model during training and evaluation. We find that the performance of each extraction method depends strongly on how the corresponding model was trained. Considering the toy models themselves, the SDSM model showed the strongest overall performance: it outperformed the BCE baseline under all four extraction algorithms and produced pre-extraction outputs closest to the ground truth. These results suggest that SDSM normalization is a tractable alternative to traditional structure extraction.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.30752 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.30752v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30752 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 353 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Reducing medical claims review time with AI on AWS: The EXL Medical IDP solution
AWS · 21 sept. 2026
Deep greedy unfolding: Sorting out argsorting in greedy sparse recovery algorithms
arXiv · 27 aug. 2026

An Organizational Second Brain: Building an AI That Learns From Experts
Meta Engineering · 2 sept. 2026
DWI Connectome-based Sex Classification in Young using Supervised Variational Autoencoder
arXiv · 15 oct. 2026