În afara temei aiqbench
Această știre a fost preluată de la o sursă pe care o urmărim, dar nu ține de domeniul AI sau cuantic, așa că nu există o perspectivă aiqbench pentru ea.
Designing an Efficient Excavator Bucket for Lunar ISRU: A Comparative Study with Vision-Based Fill and Displacement Analysis
arXiv:2609.25724v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper present a spiral-cavity wheel for lunar regolith excavation and a sensor-light evaluation stack that jointly estimates fill ratio (vision), sinkage (vision), and specific energy from actuator logs. In benchtop tests (four revolutions at 5, 10, and 15~RPM) against two literature baselines, the proposed wheel achieved higher excavated mass and fill ratio, delivering 2.2-3.0 times higher excavation rate while reducing specific energy by 29 % relative to a bucket-drum baseline. Normalized sinkage (mm/kg) was also lower, indicating stable traction without bogging. Effort-time traces show a steady torque envelope with repeatable cut-carry-dump cycles across speeds. We provide a retention index $\eta$ that correlates with fill ratio and a DEM setup that reproduces experimental trends with low error. Results suggest spiral-cavity wheels can replace heavier multi-actuator diggers when mass, simplicity, and energy efficiency are mission drivers.
Abstract:This paper present a spiral-cavity wheel for lunar regolith excavation and a sensor-light evaluation stack that jointly estimates fill ratio (vision), sinkage (vision), and specific energy from actuator logs. In benchtop tests (four revolutions at 5, 10, and 15~RPM) against two literature baselines, the proposed wheel achieved higher excavated mass and fill ratio, delivering 2.2-3.0 times higher excavation rate while reducing specific energy by 29 % relative to a bucket-drum baseline. Normalized sinkage (mm/kg) was also lower, indicating stable traction without bogging. Effort-time traces show a steady torque envelope with repeatable cut-carry-dump cycles across speeds. We provide a retention index $\eta$ that correlates with fill ratio and a DEM setup that reproduces experimental trends with low error. Results suggest spiral-cavity wheels can replace heavier multi-actuator diggers when mass, simplicity, and energy efficiency are mission drivers.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2609.25724 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.25724v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.25724 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 228 cuvinte
