analiza aiqbench
This research exposes a critical vulnerability in black-box safe reinforcement learning controllers, where released demonstration data can be exploited to craft observation perturbations that bypass safety constraints without needing internal model access. The study demonstrates that current defense mechanisms like adversarial training offer inconsistent protection, highlighting the need for more robust regularization techniques when deploying robotic systems trained on public datasets.
Demonstration-Guided Observation Attacks on Black-Box Safe Reinforcement Learning Controllers for Robotic Systems
arXiv:2602.16543v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Safe reinforcement learning (Safe RL) learns robotic controllers that optimize task rewards under safety constraints, yet observation perturbations can induce safety violations. Existing safety-directed attacks often require access to victim networks, gradients, critics, or explicit specifications -- assumptions rarely met once a controller is deployed as a black box. We propose a demonstration-guided observation attack for analyzing unknown Safe RL controllers. The framework recovers a state constraint and a surrogate policy through inverse constrained reinforcement learning, and learns dynamics from demonstration transitions. Their composed gradient generates bounded observation perturbations without victim parameters, gradients, or queries; demonstrations are the only victim-specific information. Across four Bullet tasks and one MetaDrive map with three budgets per victim, the attack exceeds every same-access baseline in 12 of 15 environment-budget conditions, and in 7 of those 12 it also exceeds the privileged reference attacks with access to the victim's reward and cost critics. Demonstrations released to support safe learning thus provide an attack surface for deployed black-box controllers. A defense study shows that state-adversarial regularization reduces attack cost, whereas the tested adversarial-training and demonstration-contamination schemes provide inconsistent protection.
Abstract:Safe reinforcement learning (Safe RL) learns robotic controllers that optimize task rewards under safety constraints, yet observation perturbations can induce safety violations. Existing safety-directed attacks often require access to victim networks, gradients, critics, or explicit specifications -- assumptions rarely met once a controller is deployed as a black box. We propose a demonstration-guided observation attack for analyzing unknown Safe RL controllers. The framework recovers a state constraint and a surrogate policy through inverse constrained reinforcement learning, and learns dynamics from demonstration transitions. Their composed gradient generates bounded observation perturbations without victim parameters, gradients, or queries; demonstrations are the only victim-specific information. Across four Bullet tasks and one MetaDrive map with three budgets per victim, the attack exceeds every same-access baseline in 12 of 15 environment-budget conditions, and in 7 of those 12 it also exceeds the privileged reference attacks with access to the victim's reward and cost critics. Demonstrations released to support safe learning thus provide an attack surface for deployed black-box controllers. A defense study shows that state-adversarial regularization reduces attack cost, whereas the tested adversarial-training and demonstration-contamination schemes provide inconsistent protection.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2602.16543 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2602.16543v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.16543 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 275 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · 24 sept. 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026
AgentSafeEvo: Adversarial Co-Evolution for LLM Agent Safety
arXiv · 15 oct. 2026