analiza aiqbench
This paper is primarily about the theory of deep ReLU networks, specifically whether a best approximation (global minimum) is guaranteed to exist. That makes it squarely a machine learning topic. The counterexample shows that the existence guarantees known for shallow ReLU networks do not carry over to two-hidden-layer architectures, even for continuous targets, so practitioners should not assume a minimizer exists when analyzing deep models. The result is a narrow, small-architecture counterexample, so its practical impact depends on how far the construction generalizes to larger networks.
Deep ReLU Networks Can Fail the Best Approximation Property for Continuous Target Functions
arXiv:2610.31264v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We construct a continuous function on $[-1,1]^2$ for which the infimum of the $L^2$-approximation error over the class of ReLU networks with two hidden layers and architecture $(2,2,1,1)$ is not attained. This counterexample shows that deep ReLU networks do not satisfy the best approximation property in general, even for continuous target functions. Our findings contrast with existing results for shallow neural networks, where ReLU is one of the few activation functions that guarantee the existence of global minima in typical regression tasks. The proof is based on the fact that the breaklines for neurons in the second hidden layer can bend, which breaks the symmetry arguments used in the one-hidden-layer case.
Abstract:We construct a continuous function on $[-1,1]^2$ for which the infimum of the $L^2$-approximation error over the class of ReLU networks with two hidden layers and architecture $(2,2,1,1)$ is not attained. This counterexample shows that deep ReLU networks do not satisfy the best approximation property in general, even for continuous target functions. Our findings contrast with existing results for shallow neural networks, where ReLU is one of the few activation functions that guarantee the existence of global minima in typical regression tasks. The proof is based on the fact that the breaklines for neurons in the second hidden layer can bend, which breaks the symmetry arguments used in the one-hidden-layer case.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Numerical Analysis (math.NA); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2610.31264 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.31264v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.31264 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 212 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Universal Approximation of Measure-to-Measure Operators by Pushforwards
arXiv · 30 sept. 2026

Researchers Map Digitisation Error Growth in Gauge Theory
Quantum Zeitgeist · 29 sept. 2026
Perturbation-based Non-perturbative Method
arXiv · 4 nov. 2026
Rapid Fredholm stabilization of the Kuramoto--Sivashinsky equation with unrestricted, spatially-varying anti-diffusion
arXiv · 7 oct. 2026