analiza aiqbench
This paper reframes persistent errors in automatic speech recognition not merely as technical glitches but as embedded linguistic policies that reinforce colonial hierarchies and exclude marginalized communities. By introducing a taxonomy of harms (Misrecognition, Misalignment, Mistrust) and proposing participatory design frameworks, the work establishes critical new standards for auditing ASR models to ensure they are culturally competent rather than perpetuating bias.
Decolonizing Linguistic Policies in Automated Speech Recognition: A Framework for Cross-Culturally Competent Speech AI
arXiv:2608.06141v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper focuses on automatic speech recognition (ASR) and ASR-mediated voice interfaces that shape access to public services, healthcare, and education. We argue that persistent failures for low-resource, Indigenous, and non-standard language varieties are not only technical errors, but also implicit linguistic policies that reproduce colonial language hierarchies. Drawing on linguistic capital, raciolinguistic ideology, language policy research, and decolonial computing, we show how data, metrics, and model priors determine whose voices become machine-legible. We introduce the Three Harms (3M) taxonomy---Misrecognition, Misalignment, and Mistrust---and a seven-layer situatedness model for linguistic diversity in ASR and ASR-mediated voice interfaces. We then propose a participatory framework and minimum audit protocol for culturally competent ASR, positioning affected communities as co-designers, evaluators, and governance partners.
Abstract:This paper focuses on automatic speech recognition (ASR) and ASR-mediated voice interfaces that shape access to public services, healthcare, and education. We argue that persistent failures for low-resource, Indigenous, and non-standard language varieties are not only technical errors, but also implicit linguistic policies that reproduce colonial language hierarchies. Drawing on linguistic capital, raciolinguistic ideology, language policy research, and decolonial computing, we show how data, metrics, and model priors determine whose voices become machine-legible. We introduce the Three Harms (3M) taxonomy---Misrecognition, Misalignment, and Mistrust---and a seven-layer situatedness model for linguistic diversity in ASR and ASR-mediated voice interfaces. We then propose a participatory framework and minimum audit protocol for culturally competent ASR, positioning affected communities as co-designers, evaluators, and governance partners.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
arXiv:2608.06141 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.06141v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.06141 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 221 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · 21 mai 2026
Explainable and Generalisable LLM-based Cognitive Decline Detection with Spontaneous Speech
arXiv · 30 sept. 2026

Six Principles of Voice Design: Designing for the Ear and Encoding It into Agent Script
Salesforce Blog · 8 oct. 2026

Implement vector-prompt document classification using Amazon Bedrock
AWS · 18 aug. 2026