analiza aiqbench
This paper advances the theoretical foundations of decentralized optimization by establishing optimal regret bounds for strongly geodesically convex functions on Riemannian manifolds. It resolves key incompatibilities between decaying step sizes in centralized regimes and network-error analyses, offering significant improvements over existing methods that only handle standard g-convexity. These results are critical for optimizing complex models where data is distributed across agents operating within non-Euclidean geometries.
Decentralized Online Riemannian Optimization for Strongly Geodesically Convex Functions
arXiv:2607.20316v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study decentralized online optimization for strongly geodesically convex (strongly g-convex) losses on Riemannian manifolds with bounded sectional curvature, including positively curved manifolds. In centralized Riemannian optimization, strong g-convexity tightens the optimal regret from $O(\sqrt{T})$ to $O(\log T)$, where $T$ is the time horizon; in the decentralized Riemannian setting, however, existing methods address only g-convex losses, leaving the strongly g-convex regime unexplored. One challenge is that the required decaying step size in the centralized regime is incompatible with existing network-error analyses, which typically assume a fixed step size. First, we provide a general network-error analysis for time-varying schedules. Next, we build on this analysis to establish the first $O(\log T)$ static regret bound for decentralized online Riemannian gradient descent, matching the minimax-optimal rate for strongly-convex Euclidean online optimization. Finally, we prove the same $O(\log T)$ regret bound for the two-point bandit feedback setting using novel strong subconvexity arguments for the smoothed versions of the loss functions.
Abstract:We study decentralized online optimization for strongly geodesically convex (strongly g-convex) losses on Riemannian manifolds with bounded sectional curvature, including positively curved manifolds. In centralized Riemannian optimization, strong g-convexity tightens the optimal regret from $O(\sqrt{T})$ to $O(\log T)$, where $T$ is the time horizon; in the decentralized Riemannian setting, however, existing methods address only g-convex losses, leaving the strongly g-convex regime unexplored. One challenge is that the required decaying step size in the centralized regime is incompatible with existing network-error analyses, which typically assume a fixed step size. First, we provide a general network-error analysis for time-varying schedules. Next, we build on this analysis to establish the first $O(\log T)$ static regret bound for decentralized online Riemannian gradient descent, matching the minimax-optimal rate for strongly-convex Euclidean online optimization. Finally, we prove the same $O(\log T)$ regret bound for the two-point bandit feedback setting using novel strong subconvexity arguments for the smoothed versions of the loss functions.
Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
arXiv:2607.20316 [math.OC]
(or arXiv:2607.20316v1 [math.OC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.20316 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 257 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Curvature-Independent Regret Bounds for Distributed Online Optimization on Hadamard Manifolds
arXiv · 15 sept. 2026
Iso-Riemannian Optimization on Learned Data Manifolds
arXiv · 19 aug. 2026
Decentralized Online Riemannian Optimization Beyond Hadamard Manifolds
arXiv · 9 iun. 2026
Nonconvex Matrix Factorization is Geodesically Convex: Global Landscape Analysis for Fixed-rank Matrix Optimization From a Riemannian Perspective
arXiv · 21 iul. 2026