analiza aiqbench
This research bridges the gap between complex interpretable machine learning models and non-expert users by formalizing data storytelling techniques like "What-if" scenarios. By combining SHAP values with large language models, the study demonstrates a significant improvement in user comprehension while simultaneously employing data desensitization to protect sensitive information. The proposed framework offers a practical pathway for deploying explainable AI systems that are both accessible and privacy-preserving.
Data storytelling meets interpretable machine learning: Decoding AI decisions for non-experts without revealing sensitive data and model details
arXiv:2609.15722v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI-driven automated decision-making requires both predictive performance and interpretability. Recent advances in interpretable machine learning (IML) provide tools for explaining model predictions, but the technical complexity of these explanations may hinder accessibility to non-experts. To address this challenge, this study integrates data storytelling with IML to enhance the explainability of AI-generated decisions for a broader audience. Following the design science research (DSR) paradigm, this study proposes a formal definition of data storytelling in IML, introduces the DIST Pyramid to align data storytelling with IML, and presents the I-P-O Model to describe their interactions. It further develops an architecture to explain AI decisions through distinct "What-if" and "Why-not" event-generation processes. The architecture also employs data desensitization to protect sensitive input data. To validate the approach, a case study is conducted with the Boston Housing dataset, using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values and large language models (LLMs) to generate data stories with And-But-Therefore (ABT) structures. An empirical evaluation shows that 76.4% and 74.3% of respondents rated the "What-if" and "Why-not" data stories as more comprehensible, with significantly higher accessibility scores than traditional SHAP visualizations. The paper concludes with the presentation of a narrative interpretation framework that integrates IML and data storytelling, thereby expanding the research scope as well as the practical applicability of AI decision-making.
Abstract:AI-driven automated decision-making requires both predictive performance and interpretability. Recent advances in interpretable machine learning (IML) provide tools for explaining model predictions, but the technical complexity of these explanations may hinder accessibility to non-experts. To address this challenge, this study integrates data storytelling with IML to enhance the explainability of AI-generated decisions for a broader audience. Following the design science research (DSR) paradigm, this study proposes a formal definition of data storytelling in IML, introduces the DIST Pyramid to align data storytelling with IML, and presents the I-P-O Model to describe their interactions. It further develops an architecture to explain AI decisions through distinct "What-if" and "Why-not" event-generation processes. The architecture also employs data desensitization to protect sensitive input data. To validate the approach, a case study is conducted with the Boston Housing dataset, using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values and large language models (LLMs) to generate data stories with And-But-Therefore (ABT) structures. An empirical evaluation shows that 76.4% and 74.3% of respondents rated the "What-if" and "Why-not" data stories as more comprehensible, with significantly higher accessibility scores than traditional SHAP visualizations. The paper concludes with the presentation of a narrative interpretation framework that integrates IML and data storytelling, thereby expanding the research scope as well as the practical applicability of AI decision-making.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.15722 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.15722v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.15722 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 317 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Microsoft’s AI chief says superintelligence is near, but won’t take your job
The Verge · 8 iun. 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · 27 aug. 2026

Master AI Chip Principles With New IEEE Design Program
IEEE Spectrum · 9 oct. 2026

Dr. Jill Lepore on why AI backlash is vital for the future
The Verge · 20 iul. 2026