analiza aiqbench
This research introduces a new benchmark using historical Czech documents to evaluate zero-shot topic localization, revealing significant performance gaps between large language models and distilled token embedding approaches. The study highlights that while top-tier LLMs approach human-level agreement in identifying topic spans, smaller-scale models remain competitive, offering insights for resource-constrained NLP applications.
CzechTopic: A Benchmark for Zero-Shot Topic Localization in Historical Czech Documents
arXiv:2603.03884v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Topic localization aims to identify spans of text that express a given topic defined by a name and description. To study this task, we introduce a human-annotated benchmark based on Czech historical documents, containing human-defined topics together with manually annotated spans and supporting evaluation at both document and word levels. Evaluation is performed relative to human agreement rather than a single reference annotation. We evaluate a diverse range of large language models alongside BERT-based models fine-tuned on a distilled development dataset. Results reveal substantial variability among LLMs, with performance ranging from near-human topic detection to pronounced failures in span localization. While the strongest models approach human agreement, the distilled token embedding models remain competitive despite their smaller scale. The dataset and evaluation framework are publicly available at: https://github.com/dcgm/czechtopic.
Abstract:Topic localization aims to identify spans of text that express a given topic defined by a name and description. To study this task, we introduce a human-annotated benchmark based on Czech historical documents, containing human-defined topics together with manually annotated spans and supporting evaluation at both document and word levels. Evaluation is performed relative to human agreement rather than a single reference annotation. We evaluate a diverse range of large language models alongside BERT-based models fine-tuned on a distilled development dataset. Results reveal substantial variability among LLMs, with performance ranging from near-human topic detection to pronounced failures in span localization. While the strongest models approach human agreement, the distilled token embedding models remain competitive despite their smaller scale. The dataset and evaluation framework are publicly available at: this https URL.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2603.03884 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2603.03884v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.03884 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 226 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 3 oct. 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026

Prophet vs NeuralProphet vs TimeGPT vs Chronos: A Practical Comparison
Analytics Vidhya · 9 iun. 2026

Presentation: Building Evals for AI Adoption: from Principles to Practice
InfoQ · 29 mai 2026