analiza aiqbench
This research introduces Coupled Calibration and Learning (CCL), a novel distillation algorithm designed to mitigate teacher bias in large language models without requiring target-domain reward feedback. By iteratively calibrating the teacher using source data while training the student on target questions, the method theoretically guarantees convergence to an optimal policy even under covariate shift. This approach offers a significant advancement for deploying smaller models in domains where reliable reward signals are unavailable or difficult to obtain.
Coupled Calibration and Learning: Mitigating Teacher Bias in LLM Distillation without Target-Domain Reward Feedback
arXiv:2609.17474v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) distillation aims to transfer the capabilities of a powerful teacher to a smaller student. Direct imitation, however, can also transfer the teacher's systematic bias and errors. This challenge is particularly pronounced under covariate shift, when the teacher's reliability on target questions is uncertain and target-domain reward feedback is unavailable. We propose Coupled Calibration and Learning (CCL), an LLM distillation algorithm that couples teacher calibration with student updates through token-level branching, using reward feedback only on source questions. Each iteration calibrates the teacher using source feedback and then uses the calibrated teacher to train the student on target questions. The updated student, in turn, informs subsequent calibration. In an autoregressive policy framework, we prove that the output student's expected average Kullback-Leibler divergence to the oracle student converges to zero at a polynomial rate in the number of iterations. The oracle maximizes the true reference-regularized target reward within the student class, which need not represent the unrestricted optimal policy. Our analysis quantifies the progress of projected student gradient updates while controlling the error in teacher calibration. We further establish a separation from regularized direct matching: its error relative to the oracle student can remain bounded away from zero even when the teacher achieves higher regularized target reward than every student policy. These results demonstrate that LLM distillation can overcome persistent teacher bias and recover the optimal student through coupled calibration and learning, without target-domain reward feedback.
Abstract:Large language model (LLM) distillation aims to transfer the capabilities of a powerful teacher to a smaller student. Direct imitation, however, can also transfer the teacher's systematic bias and errors. This challenge is particularly pronounced under covariate shift, when the teacher's reliability on target questions is uncertain and target-domain reward feedback is unavailable. We propose Coupled Calibration and Learning (CCL), an LLM distillation algorithm that couples teacher calibration with student updates through token-level branching, using reward feedback only on source questions. Each iteration calibrates the teacher using source feedback and then uses the calibrated teacher to train the student on target questions. The updated student, in turn, informs subsequent calibration. In an autoregressive policy framework, we prove that the output student's expected average Kullback-Leibler divergence to the oracle student converges to zero at a polynomial rate in the number of iterations. The oracle maximizes the true reference-regularized target reward within the student class, which need not represent the unrestricted optimal policy. Our analysis quantifies the progress of projected student gradient updates while controlling the error in teacher calibration. We further establish a separation from regularized direct matching: its error relative to the oracle student can remain bounded away from zero even when the teacher achieves higher regularized target reward than every student policy. These results demonstrate that LLM distillation can overcome persistent teacher bias and recover the optimal student through coupled calibration and learning, without target-domain reward feedback.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Statistics Theory (math.ST); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2609.17474 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.17474v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.17474 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 341 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Exploring self-distilled reasoning for supervised fine-tuning with Amazon Nova
AWS · 21 iul. 2026
[Paper] Distillation for Incrimination and Distillation for Capabilities
LessWrong · 9 oct. 2026

Attackers Can Subliminally Implant a Backdoor at Low Sample Count Without Prompt Access
LessWrong · 3 aug. 2026

Thousand-dimensional structure
AI Alignment Forum · 30 iul. 2026