analiza aiqbench
This paper tackles a narrow but practical problem in differentially private machine learning: variable batch sizes and truncation can leak privacy, and standard amplification bounds assume those sizes stay hidden. The proposed fix pads batches with a random number of dummy points so the batch size is privatized and truncation no longer erodes the guarantee. For ML practitioners running DP-SGD in distributed systems, the result is a potentially tighter privacy-efficiency tradeoff, though the empirical gains are shown only for Poisson sampling against one prior baseline.
Counting on Dummies: Privacy Amplification with Observable Counts and Truncated Batches
arXiv:2610.42139v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In many practical deployments of Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD), the server processes data in batches. Randomly sampling these batches allows for better privacy bounds via privacy amplification results. Most sampling schemes with provable privacy amplification, including Poisson sampling and random allocation, result in variable batch sizes. The privacy guarantee of these schemes requires that the batch sizes are not revealed. In distributed settings, the server performing the aggregation or any party observing the communication traffic may learn these batch sizes. Furthermore, in both centralized and distributed settings, memory and computation constraints may require each batch to be of some maximum size $s$, necessitating truncation of the batch when it exceeds this limit. It is known that this truncation can result in a significant increase in privacy loss. In this work, we address both of these challenges via a simple mechanism that uses a random number of \emph{dummy points} to privatize the batch size and maintain the privacy guarantee even under truncation. We demonstrate that our mechanism is easy to implement in a distributed setting, and provide a general analysis of this mechanism for both Poisson sampling and random allocation. Our analysis is designed to support efficient and relatively tight privacy accounting. It also effectively amplifies the privacy of the count releases by subsampling, making the expected number of dummy points asymptotically smaller than what is needed to directly privatize the (sensitivity-one) batch sizes with non-negative noise. For Poisson sampling with truncated batches, we demonstrate empirically that our mechanism achieves better privacy--efficiency tradeoffs than the direct accounting for truncation recently given by (Ganesh, 2025).
Abstract:In many practical deployments of Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD), the server processes data in batches. Randomly sampling these batches allows for better privacy bounds via privacy amplification results. Most sampling schemes with provable privacy amplification, including Poisson sampling and random allocation, result in variable batch sizes. The privacy guarantee of these schemes requires that the batch sizes are not revealed. In distributed settings, the server performing the aggregation or any party observing the communication traffic may learn these batch sizes. Furthermore, in both centralized and distributed settings, memory and computation constraints may require each batch to be of some maximum size $s$, necessitating truncation of the batch when it exceeds this limit. It is known that this truncation can result in a significant increase in privacy loss. In this work, we address both of these challenges via a simple mechanism that uses a random number of \emph{dummy points} to privatize the batch size and maintain the privacy guarantee even under truncation. We demonstrate that our mechanism is easy to implement in a distributed setting, and provide a general analysis of this mechanism for both Poisson sampling and random allocation. Our analysis is designed to support efficient and relatively tight privacy accounting. It also effectively amplifies the privacy of the count releases by subsampling, making the expected number of dummy points asymptotically smaller than what is needed to directly privatize the (sensitivity-one) batch sizes with non-negative noise. For Poisson sampling with truncated batches, we demonstrate empirically that our mechanism achieves better privacy--efficiency tradeoffs than the direct accounting for truncation recently given by (Ganesh, 2025).
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
arXiv:2610.42139 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.42139v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.42139 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 363 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Quantum transistors for heat flux in and out of working substance parts: harmonic vs transmon and Kerr environs
arXiv · 2 sept. 2026
Dissipative acousto-mechanical parametric interface between high-overtone acoustics and flexural phonons
arXiv · 18 sept. 2026
When Gradient Importance Lies: Adaptive LoRA Rank Allocation Fails Under GRPO
arXiv · 18 aug. 2026
Experimental realization of quantum-computing-enhanced sensing
arXiv · 9 sept. 2026