analiza aiqbench
CoT-Core addresses the high computational cost of LLM evaluation by leveraging zero-shot Chain-of-Thought reasoning to cluster questions based on intrinsic logical equivalence rather than surface text similarity. This training-free framework significantly reduces testing overhead while maintaining score fidelity, though its effectiveness is bounded by task complexity thresholds. The work advances efficient model assessment methodologies critical for accelerating continuous AI development cycles.
CoT-Core: Accelerating LLM Evaluation via CoT-Aware Coreset Selection
arXiv:2608.00014v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) incurs prohibitive computational overhead during continuous development processes. While coreset selection accelerates evaluation, existing methods either suffer from a severe ``cold start'' bottleneck requiring massive historical logs (e.g., Item Response Theory) or exhibit a surface lexical bias that misses the underlying reasoning manifold of tasks. We propose CoT-Core, a novel training-free core question selection framework. Recognizing that lexically disparate questions can share equivalent underlying logic, CoT-Core prompts LLMs to unroll zero-shot Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning trajectories. Projecting these paths into a latent space effectively clusters questions by intrinsic logical equivalence rather than superficial text similarity. Extensive experiments on GSM8K, MMLU, MMLU-Pro, and GPQA demonstrate that CoT-Core drastically reduces evaluation costs while maintaining high-fidelity score estimation, and delineate the boundary conditions of reasoning-aware pruning, revealing that its efficacy is intrinsically gated by task complexity.
Abstract:Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) incurs prohibitive computational overhead during continuous development processes. While coreset selection accelerates evaluation, existing methods either suffer from a severe ``cold start'' bottleneck requiring massive historical logs (e.g., Item Response Theory) or exhibit a surface lexical bias that misses the underlying reasoning manifold of tasks. We propose CoT-Core, a novel training-free core question selection framework. Recognizing that lexically disparate questions can share equivalent underlying logic, CoT-Core prompts LLMs to unroll zero-shot Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning trajectories. Projecting these paths into a latent space effectively clusters questions by intrinsic logical equivalence rather than superficial text similarity. Extensive experiments on GSM8K, MMLU, MMLU-Pro, and GPQA demonstrate that CoT-Core drastically reduces evaluation costs while maintaining high-fidelity score estimation, and delineate the boundary conditions of reasoning-aware pruning, revealing that its efficacy is intrinsically gated by task complexity.
23 pages, 3 figures, 10 tables. Includes appendix
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.00014 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.00014v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.00014 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 237 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026

The world's best gradual disempowerment model organism: Frontier AI labs
LessWrong · 29 sept. 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 10 sept. 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · 7 iun. 2026