analiza aiqbench
This research proposes a method to maintain semantic substrates for retrieval-augmented systems by updating embeddings incrementally rather than re-computing them from scratch. The study empirically demonstrates that maintenance costs scale with the volume of changes instead of total corpus size, offering significant efficiency gains over full reconstruction approaches. This advancement addresses critical scalability challenges in building persistent knowledge bases for agentic AI applications without sacrificing semantic fidelity.
Cost Scales with Change, Not Corpus Size: Incrementally Maintaining an Evolving Semantic Substrate
arXiv:2608.16621v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-augmented and agentic question-answering systems increasingly re-derive the meaning of a corpus at query time. Put plainly, instead of re-deriving what a corpus means on every question, the work is done once when a document arrives and is thereafter merely consulted -- a compiler, not an interpreter, of meaning. An alternative is to compile that meaning once, at ingest time, into a compact, queryable semantic substrate and maintain it as the corpus evolves. The central objection is maintenance cost: rebuilding a truncated singular value decomposition (SVD) on every change appears prohibitive, and a change of embedding model seems to force a full re-embedding. We argue and show empirically that maintenance cost scales with the amount of change, not corpus size. On a controlled synthetic pilot (dimension 256, rank 32, a corpus grown from 3,000 to 9,000 documents over 50 update events), incremental low-rank updates were 33.7 times cheaper per update than full re-SVD and 23.8 times cheaper cumulatively, while the incremental subspace tracked the full recomputation to within floating-point precision (maximum principal-angle drift below 1e-11 degrees; recall@10 = 1.0). An orthogonal Procrustes virtual axis update recovered 0.95 mean cosine to truly re-embedded vectors by re-embedding only about 10 percent of the corpus. The results support maintaining, rather than repeatedly reconstructing, a semantic substrate.
Abstract:Retrieval-augmented and agentic question-answering systems increasingly re-derive the meaning of a corpus at query time. Put plainly, instead of re-deriving what a corpus means on every question, the work is done once when a document arrives and is thereafter merely consulted -- a compiler, not an interpreter, of meaning. An alternative is to compile that meaning once, at ingest time, into a compact, queryable semantic substrate and maintain it as the corpus evolves. The central objection is maintenance cost: rebuilding a truncated singular value decomposition (SVD) on every change appears prohibitive, and a change of embedding model seems to force a full re-embedding. We argue and show empirically that maintenance cost scales with the amount of change, not corpus size. On a controlled synthetic pilot (dimension 256, rank 32, a corpus grown from 3,000 to 9,000 documents over 50 update events), incremental low-rank updates were 33.7 times cheaper per update than full re-SVD and 23.8 times cheaper cumulatively, while the incremental subspace tracked the full recomputation to within floating-point precision (maximum principal-angle drift below 1e-11 degrees; recall@10 = 1.0). An orthogonal Procrustes virtual axis update recovered 0.95 mean cosine to truly re-embedded vectors by re-embedding only about 10 percent of the corpus. The results support maintaining, rather than repeatedly reconstructing, a semantic substrate.
5 pages, 5 figures, 1 table. Accepted and presented at the 2026 International Electronics Symposium (IES), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, August 1-3, 2026 (IEEE technically co-sponsored). Authors' accepted version
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Databases (cs.DB); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
H.3.3; H.3.1; H.2.4
arXiv:2608.16621 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.16621v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16621 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 266 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Selecting a vector store for Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Bases
AWS · 17 sept. 2026

Scaling Karpathy’s LLM wiki: Why your knowledge base needs a graph
Neo4j · 31 aug. 2026
How Hugging Face Inference Endpoints, Jobs, and Buckets Power Search on Papers with Code
Hugging Face · 21 aug. 2026
RAG Deserves an Index: Why Ingest-Time Compilation Beats Query-Time Interpretation
arXiv · 24 aug. 2026