analiza aiqbench
This research addresses the computational complexity of correlation clustering on incomplete graphs derived from random subsampling, offering improved approximation guarantees over general graph bounds. By bridging the gap between complete and arbitrary graph regimes, the study provides theoretical insights relevant to unsupervised learning scenarios where data sparsity is inherent.
Correlation Clustering with Random Partial Information
arXiv:2608.16315v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Correlation clustering is a fundamental unsupervised learning problem. On complete graphs, both the min-disagreement and min-max objectives admit constant-factor approximations, yet on general (non-complete) graphs, the best guarantees blow up to $O(\log n)$ and $O(\sqrt{n})$. This gap between the two regimes motivates the following question: are there classes of incomplete graphs that circumvent the lower bounds on general graphs and admit approximation guarantees approaching those attainable on complete graphs? We study a natural class of graphs obtained by randomly subsampling a complete signed graph $G$, where each edge is independently deleted with probability $q$. For such graph instances both for the min-max and the min-disagreement objectives, we prove approximation guarantees (depending on $q$) that are substantially better than the bounds achievable for general graphs. We supplement our theoretical results with experiments that also suggest that the approximation ratios of our algorithm are close to those of the complete graph and better than the worst-case bounds for general (non-complete) graphs.
Abstract:Correlation clustering is a fundamental unsupervised learning problem. On complete graphs, both the min-disagreement and min-max objectives admit constant-factor approximations, yet on general (non-complete) graphs, the best guarantees blow up to $O(\log n)$ and $O(\sqrt{n})$. This gap between the two regimes motivates the following question: are there classes of incomplete graphs that circumvent the lower bounds on general graphs and admit approximation guarantees approaching those attainable on complete graphs? We study a natural class of graphs obtained by randomly subsampling a complete signed graph $G$, where each edge is independently deleted with probability $q$. For such graph instances both for the min-max and the min-disagreement objectives, we prove approximation guarantees (depending on $q$) that are substantially better than the bounds achievable for general graphs. We supplement our theoretical results with experiments that also suggest that the approximation ratios of our algorithm are close to those of the complete graph and better than the worst-case bounds for general (non-complete) graphs.
Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.16315 [cs.DS]
(or arXiv:2608.16315v1 [cs.DS] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16315 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 258 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · 27 iul. 2026

Quantifying mixed-state entanglement via partial transpose and realignment moments
Quantum Journal · 19 aug. 2026

Quantum Measurement, How Reading a Qubit Works
Quantum Zeitgeist · 5 sept. 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · 30 iul. 2026