analiza aiqbench
This research provides rigorous, non-asymptotic error bounds for the RMSprop optimizer that remain uniformly controlled across all hyperparameter choices, addressing a longstanding gap in theoretical guarantees for adaptive SGD methods. By explicitly characterizing initialization decay and memory errors, the work offers critical insights into the stability and convergence behavior of foundational AI training algorithms under convex stochastic optimization.
Convergence rates for the RMSprop optimizer with full control of the hyperparameters
arXiv:2608.30382v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Popular adaptive stochastic gradient descent (SGD) methods to train artificial intelligence (AI) systems include the RMSprop, the Adam, and the AdamW optimizers, where the adaptivity parts in Adam and AdamW basically just coincide with RMSprop. Such adaptive methods involve several hyperparameters including the regularization parameter $\epsilon$ (which ensures that one does not divide by 0 and is often chosen to be very close to zero such as $10^{-8}$ in PyTorch by default) and the second moment decay parameter $\beta$ (which is often chosen to be very close to $1$ such as 0.99 (RMSprop) and 0.999 (Adam and AdamW) in PyTorch by default). Despite the high relevance of such methods, it remains an open research problem to provide error estimates for such methods with the error constants being not exploding but uniformly bounded with the respect to the hyperparameters, even in the situation of convex stochastic optimization problems. It is the key contribution of this work to essentially solve this problem for RMSprop. Specifically, we bound the expectation of the stopped evaluation of the objective function at the RMSprop process from above by the sum of an initialization term that decays exponentially in the training time, a stochastic approximation remainder of order $\gamma_n$, and a memory error of order $( 1 - \beta)^2$ with the error constants being uniformly controlled over all admissible choices of the step sizes, the second moment decay parameter $\beta$ and the regularization parameter $\epsilon\in[0,1]$ (also covering $\epsilon=0$). Our non-asymptotic error estimates hold not just for all sufficiently large n but hold for every gradient step $n=1,2,3,...$ with all error constants being explicitly specified. The key innovative new feature in the proof of our analysis are suitable inverse moment bounds for the second moment process in RMSprop.
Abstract:Popular adaptive stochastic gradient descent (SGD) methods to train artificial intelligence (AI) systems include the RMSprop, the Adam, and the AdamW optimizers, where the adaptivity parts in Adam and AdamW basically just coincide with RMSprop. Such adaptive methods involve several hyperparameters including the regularization parameter $\epsilon$ (which ensures that one does not divide by 0 and is often chosen to be very close to zero such as $10^{-8}$ in PyTorch by default) and the second moment decay parameter $\beta$ (which is often chosen to be very close to $1$ such as 0.99 (RMSprop) and 0.999 (Adam and AdamW) in PyTorch by default). Despite the high relevance of such methods, it remains an open research problem to provide error estimates for such methods with the error constants being not exploding but uniformly bounded with the respect to the hyperparameters, even in the situation of convex stochastic optimization problems. It is the key contribution of this work to essentially solve this problem for RMSprop. Specifically, we bound the expectation of the stopped evaluation of the objective function at the RMSprop process from above by the sum of an initialization term that decays exponentially in the training time, a stochastic approximation remainder of order $\gamma_n$, and a memory error of order $( 1 - \beta)^2$ with the error constants being uniformly controlled over all admissible choices of the step sizes, the second moment decay parameter $\beta$ and the regularization parameter $\epsilon\in[0,1]$ (also covering $\epsilon=0$). Our non-asymptotic error estimates hold not just for all sufficiently large n but hold for every gradient step $n=1,2,3,...$ with all error constants being explicitly specified. The key innovative new feature in the proof of our analysis are suitable inverse moment bounds for the second moment process in RMSprop.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC); Probability (math.PR)
arXiv:2608.30382 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.30382v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.30382 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 390 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

The art and science of hyperparameter optimization on Amazon Nova Forge
AWS · 2 iun. 2026

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · 21 iul. 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · 8 oct. 2026
Training a coding model to paint watercolours with TRL and OpenEnv
Hugging Face · 3 sept. 2026