analiza aiqbench
This study addresses the cost of expanding reasoning model capabilities by introducing Continual Reasoning Gym, which evaluates sequential reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR). The authors demonstrate that while standard sequential training suffers from performance gaps compared to joint multitask training, a significant portion of this gap stems from missed opportunities to leverage shared reasoning structures across tasks. By proposing Continual Prompt Replay (CPR), the research shows how replaying previous prompts can effectively harness these shared structures, allowing models to reach performance levels comparable to expensive joint training methods.
Continual Reasoning Gym: Diagnosing and Harnessing Shared Reasoning in Continual RLVR
arXiv:2608.18574v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) commonly post-trains reasoning models on multiple tasks, while rerunning multitask RLVR (MTRL) as new tasks are added makes capability expansion costly. We therefore study continual RLVR, which updates the existing model as each task arrives. The central question is whether a model updated this way can perform as well as a jointly trained model. To answer this question, we introduce Continual Reasoning Gym, a continual-RLVR environment that organizes text and visual reasoning tasks into five task sequences. In this setting, we identify two key observations: Sequential RLVR exhibits modest forgetting, yet its final performance remains below that of MTRL. To understand the latter, we decompose final performance and show that forgetting accounts for only part of the gap. To explain the former, we identify shared reasoning: transferable reasoning structure allows training on one task to support others on average. We therefore introduce Continual Prompt Replay (CPR), which harnesses shared reasoning to improve learning on the arriving and future tasks by replaying previous-task prompts and regenerating their responses with the current policy. On average, only CPR reaches MTRL-level performance.
Abstract:Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) commonly post-trains reasoning models on multiple tasks, while rerunning multitask RLVR (MTRL) as new tasks are added makes capability expansion costly. We therefore study continual RLVR, which updates the existing model as each task arrives. The central question is whether a model updated this way can perform as well as a jointly trained model. To answer this question, we introduce Continual Reasoning Gym, a continual-RLVR environment that organizes text and visual reasoning tasks into five task sequences. In this setting, we identify two key observations: Sequential RLVR exhibits modest forgetting, yet its final performance remains below that of MTRL. To understand the latter, we decompose final performance and show that forgetting accounts for only part of the gap. To explain the former, we identify shared reasoning: transferable reasoning structure allows training on one task to support others on average. We therefore introduce Continual Prompt Replay (CPR), which harnesses shared reasoning to improve learning on the arriving and future tasks by replaying previous-task prompts and regenerating their responses with the current policy. On average, only CPR reaches MTRL-level performance.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.18574 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.18574v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18574 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 276 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Presentation: The Five Stages of AI Maturity in Engineering Organizations - Where and Why Teams Get Stuck
InfoQ · 4 aug. 2026
Introducing North Mini Code: Cohere’s First Model For Developers
Hugging Face · 9 iun. 2026

Brief independent investigation of agents’ behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident
METR · 26 aug. 2026
AutoRef: Harness Optimization for Agentic Multi-Reference Image Generation
arXiv · 29 sept. 2026