analiza aiqbench
This research introduces a conflict-predictive variable horizon algorithm for multi-drone collision avoidance within distributed model predictive control frameworks. By dynamically adjusting the planning window based on local neighbor trajectories, the method reduces computational costs while maintaining recursive feasibility and asymptotic stability in dense airspace scenarios. The approach represents a significant advancement in autonomous system safety and efficiency without requiring changes to the underlying control architecture.
Conflict-Predictive Variable Horizons in Multi-Drone Distributed Model Predictive Control
arXiv:2609.13270v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In distributed model predictive control for multi-drone collision avoidance, a fixed prediction horizon forces a compromise: a short horizon is inexpensive but reacts late to approaching neighbors, whereas a long one anticipates conflicts at a per-step cost that grows superlinearly with its length. We propose a conflict-predictive variable horizon that each drone sets locally, leaving the distributed model predictive control itself unchanged. From a short history of observed positions, a drone extrapolates the flight lines of its neighbors, tests each against its own using confidence funnels that narrow with prediction range, and obtains each time to conflict in closed form. The horizon is then the smallest admissible value whose planning window covers the farthest predicted conflict. It collapses to its minimum in clear airspace and grows only when a conflict lies ahead. Provided this minimum meets a single computable feasibility bound, we prove that recursive feasibility and asymptotic stability are preserved for every horizon the policy can select. These guarantees hold for a linear model, and a cascaded inner loop reduces each quadrotor's translational dynamics to a perturbed double integrator, so they carry over to the linearized quadrotor model and, as practical stability, to the full nonlinear one. In simulation on dense antipodal-swap benchmarks, the variable horizon reduces both per-step solver cost and total computation well below those of a long fixed horizon, and it maintains separation in every run, which a short fixed horizon of comparable per-step cost does not.
Abstract:In distributed model predictive control for multi-drone collision avoidance, a fixed prediction horizon forces a compromise: a short horizon is inexpensive but reacts late to approaching neighbors, whereas a long one anticipates conflicts at a per-step cost that grows superlinearly with its length. We propose a conflict-predictive variable horizon that each drone sets locally, leaving the distributed model predictive control itself unchanged. From a short history of observed positions, a drone extrapolates the flight lines of its neighbors, tests each against its own using confidence funnels that narrow with prediction range, and obtains each time to conflict in closed form. The horizon is then the smallest admissible value whose planning window covers the farthest predicted conflict. It collapses to its minimum in clear airspace and grows only when a conflict lies ahead. Provided this minimum meets a single computable feasibility bound, we prove that recursive feasibility and asymptotic stability are preserved for every horizon the policy can select. These guarantees hold for a linear model, and a cascaded inner loop reduces each quadrotor's translational dynamics to a perturbed double integrator, so they carry over to the linearized quadrotor model and, as practical stability, to the full nonlinear one. In simulation on dense antipodal-swap benchmarks, the variable horizon reduces both per-step solver cost and total computation well below those of a long fixed horizon, and it maintains separation in every run, which a short fixed horizon of comparable per-step cost does not.
14 pages, 6 figures, 2 tables, is already submitted to IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics as journal-paper (current status "under review"). I think this is again more eess.SY, but also if my last paper is published there, i am still not allowed to use that category, please decide for yourself
Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
arXiv:2609.13270 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.13270v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13270 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 317 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

News
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026
Coverage-driven alignment - What ‘Teaching Claude Why’ can borrow from AV verification
LessWrong · 8 iun. 2026

Taboo “equilibrium”: Less confused frames for research on AI bargaining
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026