analiza aiqbench
This research addresses the critical need for uncertainty quantification in Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, establishing baselines and proposing lightweight techniques like prompt ensembles to improve confidence calibration. By linking task success directly to calibration error, the study provides essential tools for rendering autonomous robot behaviors trustworthy and safe in real-world applications.
Confidence Calibration in Vision-Language-Action Models
arXiv:2507.17383v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Trustworthy robot behavior requires not only high levels of task success but also that the robot can reliably quantify how likely it is to succeed. To this end, we present a first-of-its-kind study of confidence calibration in vision-language-action (VLA) foundation models, which map visual observations and natural language instructions to low-level robot motor commands. We establish a confidence estimation baseline for VLAs, examine how task success relates to calibration error and how calibration evolves over time, and introduce two lightweight techniques to remedy the miscalibration we observe: prompt ensembles and action-wise Platt scaling. Our aim in this study is to begin to develop the tools and conceptual understanding necessary to render VLAs trustworthy via reliable uncertainty quantification.
Abstract:Trustworthy robot behavior requires not only high levels of task success but also that the robot can reliably quantify how likely it is to succeed. To this end, we present a first-of-its-kind study of confidence calibration in vision-language-action (VLA) foundation models, which map visual observations and natural language instructions to low-level robot motor commands. We establish a confidence estimation baseline for VLAs, examine how task success relates to calibration error and how calibration evolves over time, and introduce two lightweight techniques to remedy the miscalibration we observe: prompt ensembles and action-wise Platt scaling. Our aim in this study is to begin to develop the tools and conceptual understanding necessary to render VLAs trustworthy via reliable uncertainty quantification.
Robotics (cs.RO); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2507.17383 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2507.17383v3 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.17383 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 211 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] The Future of Latent Space
Latent Space · 25 sept. 2026

[AINews] Opus 5.5 is good at explainer videos
Latent Space · 29 sept. 2026
G$^3$VLA: Geometric Inductive Bias for Vision-Language-Action Models
arXiv · 15 oct. 2026
Uncertainty Quantification for Flow-Based Vision-Language-Action Models
arXiv · 17 iun. 2026