analiza aiqbench
This research applies transformer-based sentence embeddings to map subjective human concept representations into a shared vector space, enabling the empirical analysis of interindividual meaning variation. By providing a measurement framework and open-source code, it bridges cognitive science with computational linguistics to systematically study how different individuals encode concepts differently. The work advances the field by offering tools to quantify deviations from population norms in mental structures using standardized textual traces.
Concept Representations in Vector Space: Toward an Interdisciplinary Study of Meaning Variation
arXiv:2610.25184v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: An increasing number of disciplines recognize the explanatory potential of meaning-bearing mental structures through which individuals interpret the world and guide their behavior. Concept representations constitute a core class of these structures, emerging from individuals' experiences with concept referents and encoding and organizing their understanding of them. Recognizing a private level of meaning, where concepts are not objectively defined by rules in the world but constitute subjective structures in individuals' minds, raises a fundamental question: do different individuals actually mean the same thing when they invoke the same concept? As latent structures, concept representations are difficult to access and model empirically. The present study introduces a measurement framework that makes such representations empirically accessible through textual traces elicited under standardized conditions. Using transformer-based sentence embeddings, the framework maps standardized responses elicited for concepts into a high-dimensional shared vector space, opening concept representations to the systematic analysis of interindividual variation. It develops three analytical avenues: (1) comparing representational sharedness across concepts, (2) identifying variables that correlate with representational variation, and (3) examining how focal actors or subpopulations deviate from a reference population. Each avenue is illustrated through an empirical proof-of-concept drawing on a large-scale free-association dataset. Together, the demonstrations show how researchers from across disciplines can move from a research question and data source to analysis and interpretation. An accompanying GitHub repository provides a ready-to-use implementation of the framework for existing and custom datasets.
Abstract:An increasing number of disciplines recognize the explanatory potential of meaning-bearing mental structures through which individuals interpret the world and guide their behavior. Concept representations constitute a core class of these structures, emerging from individuals' experiences with concept referents and encoding and organizing their understanding of them. Recognizing a private level of meaning, where concepts are not objectively defined by rules in the world but constitute subjective structures in individuals' minds, raises a fundamental question: do different individuals actually mean the same thing when they invoke the same concept? As latent structures, concept representations are difficult to access and model empirically. The present study introduces a measurement framework that makes such representations empirically accessible through textual traces elicited under standardized conditions. Using transformer-based sentence embeddings, the framework maps standardized responses elicited for concepts into a high-dimensional shared vector space, opening concept representations to the systematic analysis of interindividual variation. It develops three analytical avenues: (1) comparing representational sharedness across concepts, (2) identifying variables that correlate with representational variation, and (3) examining how focal actors or subpopulations deviate from a reference population. Each avenue is illustrated through an empirical proof-of-concept drawing on a large-scale free-association dataset. Together, the demonstrations show how researchers from across disciplines can move from a research question and data source to analysis and interpretation. An accompanying GitHub repository provides a ready-to-use implementation of the framework for existing and custom datasets.
20 pages, 5 figures. Companion paper to arXiv:2610.15496. Code: this https URL
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
arXiv:2610.25184 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.25184v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.25184 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 344 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
RPPNet: Perceptually-Grouped Rhythm-Pitch Primitives for Long-Term Structure Melody Generation via Boundary-Aware Modeling
arXiv · 23 iul. 2026
She Works, He Works: A Curious Exploration of Gender Bias in AI-Generated Imagery
arXiv · 29 oct. 2026

Neuroscience Institute researchers use AI to model brain’s image sense.
Quantum Zeitgeist · 30 aug. 2026
ForagerSim: Evaluating Embodied Map-Based Reasoning in Large-Scale Dynamic Worlds
arXiv · 21 oct. 2026