analiza aiqbench
This research investigates the computational boundaries of compiling Clifford circuits, revealing a sharp transition where inverse problems shift from classically tractable or quantum-polynomial regimes to NP-complete hardness. The findings are critical for fault-tolerance engineering, as they delineate exactly when classical simulation suffices versus when quantum algorithms offer a necessary advantage for finding logical operations under physical constraints. These results provide a rigorous map of the complexity landscape essential for optimizing resource allocation in near-term and future quantum error correction schemes.
Computational Complexity of Clifford Template Compilation: Are Quantum Computers Useful for Compiling Quantum Circuits?
arXiv:2609.35239v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A Clifford template is a finite ordered family of repeatable Clifford operations, and an instantiation specifies how many times each operation is applied. The Clifford template compilation problem asks how to choose these repetition numbers so that the template realizes a target transformation of Pauli operators. This problem arises, for example, when searching for logical operations in quantum error correction using only Clifford operations permitted by physical or fault-tolerance constraints. Although forward Clifford dynamics is efficiently classically simulable, this inverse problem has sharp complexity transitions. For commuting templates with unrestricted integer exponents, feasibility lies in $\mathrm{NP}\cap\mathrm{BQP}$ and a constructive quantum algorithm returns a particular solution together with the full exponent-relation lattice; already at $k=1$, recovering the repetition number contains finite-field discrete logarithm over $\mathbb{F}_{2^r}^{\times}$. In general, restricting every exponent to $\{0,1\}$ removes the Abelian-group closure and makes feasibility NP-complete for variable $k$, even for exactly commuting CNOT-only operations and X-type Paulis. For commuting self-inverse Clifford actions, both binary feasibility and recovery of one solution are classically polynomial-time solvable, but imposing a bound on the total repetition count is NP-complete, even for CNOT-only operations. These results reveal a rich complexity landscape within Clifford template compilation, spanning classically tractable cases, problems admitting quantum polynomial-time algorithms, and NP-complete variants.
Title:Computational Complexity of Clifford Template Compilation: Are Quantum Computers Useful for Compiling Quantum Circuits?
Abstract:A Clifford template is a finite ordered family of repeatable Clifford operations, and an instantiation specifies how many times each operation is applied. The Clifford template compilation problem asks how to choose these repetition numbers so that the template realizes a target transformation of Pauli operators. This problem arises, for example, when searching for logical operations in quantum error correction using only Clifford operations permitted by physical or fault-tolerance constraints. Although forward Clifford dynamics is efficiently classically simulable, this inverse problem has sharp complexity transitions. For commuting templates with unrestricted integer exponents, feasibility lies in $\mathrm{NP}\cap\mathrm{BQP}$ and a constructive quantum algorithm returns a particular solution together with the full exponent-relation lattice; already at $k=1$, recovering the repetition number contains finite-field discrete logarithm over $\mathbb{F}_{2^r}^{\times}$. In general, restricting every exponent to $\{0,1\}$ removes the Abelian-group closure and makes feasibility NP-complete for variable $k$, even for exactly commuting CNOT-only operations and X-type Paulis. For commuting self-inverse Clifford actions, both binary feasibility and recovery of one solution are classically polynomial-time solvable, but imposing a bound on the total repetition count is NP-complete, even for CNOT-only operations. These results reveal a rich complexity landscape within Clifford template compilation, spanning classically tractable cases, problems admitting quantum polynomial-time algorithms, and NP-complete variants.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Computational Complexity (cs.CC)
arXiv:2609.35239 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.35239v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35239 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 317 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Classiq and Rolls-Royce Embed Quantum Linear Solvers into Iterative CFD Workflows
Quantum Computing Report · 16 iun. 2026

Quantum Resource Comparison for Two Leading Surface Code Lattice Surgery Approaches
Quantum Journal · 10 aug. 2026

IBM Research Team Models Unitary Operator Mapping for Unified Quantum-Linguistic Inputs
Quantum Zeitgeist · 15 iun. 2026

Naples Team Cuts CNOT Gates in Clifford Circuits
Quantum Zeitgeist · 18 sept. 2026