analiza aiqbench
CompOrca introduces a massive-scale dataset derived from the OpenOrca corpus, systematically labeling over 4.2 million training examples using multiple independent runs of a large language model judge to assess compliance and refusal behaviors. This resource addresses a critical gap in current research by providing high-precision annotations that significantly outperform existing refusal-detection methods, enabling more rigorous study of how fine-tuning influences model alignment. The release facilitates deeper analysis of ambiguous samples where model judges disagree, offering a robust foundation for improving instruction-tuning data quality and safety protocols.
CompOrca: Corpus-Scale Compliance Labelling of Instruction-Tuning Data
arXiv:2609.37807v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Studying how fine-tuning shapes refusal and noncompliance behaviour requires identifying training examples that refuse, evade or otherwise fail to fulfil the requested task. But existing annotation covers evaluation sets of a few thousand prompts at most. We present CompOrca, a compliance labelling over the entirety of the 4,233,923-example OpenOrca corpus. Every example was classified as compliant or noncompliant by five independent passes of an open-weight LLM judge (LongCat-2.0, 1.6T parameters), and the corpus is released as unanimous compliance (94.75%), unanimous noncompliance (1.28%), and nonunanimous rows (3.97%) along with the raw vote counts. A single pass flags 2.7-3.2% of the corpus as noncompliant, while only 1.28% is flagged by all five, allowing for filtering the most ambiguous samples. Against 450 human-annotated examples, 150 of them annotated twice (human-human $\kappa = 0.93$), the unanimous compliance and noncompliance labels are 97.3% and 86.7% precise, the latter a high-precision subset, not a complete enumeration, of noncompliance. Published refusal-detection methods recall only between 0.4% and 94.1% of the noncompliance class. We release the full corpus with its per-row labels and vote counts at https://huggingface.co/datasets/cemiu/CompOrca
Abstract:Studying how fine-tuning shapes refusal and noncompliance behaviour requires identifying training examples that refuse, evade or otherwise fail to fulfil the requested task. But existing annotation covers evaluation sets of a few thousand prompts at most. We present CompOrca, a compliance labelling over the entirety of the 4,233,923-example OpenOrca corpus. Every example was classified as compliant or noncompliant by five independent passes of an open-weight LLM judge (LongCat-2.0, 1.6T parameters), and the corpus is released as unanimous compliance (94.75%), unanimous noncompliance (1.28%), and nonunanimous rows (3.97%) along with the raw vote counts. A single pass flags 2.7-3.2% of the corpus as noncompliant, while only 1.28% is flagged by all five, allowing for filtering the most ambiguous samples. Against 450 human-annotated examples, 150 of them annotated twice (human-human $\kappa = 0.93$), the unanimous compliance and noncompliance labels are 97.3% and 86.7% precise, the latter a high-precision subset, not a complete enumeration, of noncompliance. Published refusal-detection methods recall only between 0.4% and 94.1% of the noncompliance class. We release the full corpus with its per-row labels and vote counts at this https URL
Accepted to PlurVA-LLM Workshop @ AACL-IJCNLP 2026. Dataset available on HuggingFace
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.37807 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.37807v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.37807 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 290 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

The generative AI customization spectrum: From prompt engineering to custom models on AWS
AWS · 14 sept. 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · 5 oct. 2026

The art and science of hyperparameter optimization on Amazon Nova Forge
AWS · 2 iun. 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 18 sept. 2026