analiza aiqbench
Token-level teacher selection during on-policy distillation is a training-methodology question: instead of fixing one teacher per prompt or per run, the student draws on different teachers at different tokens. The authors offer theoretical criteria for teacher-student compatibility and routing, and report gains on pass@k across math, coding, kernel generation, and visual reasoning. Readers should treat the reported gains as benchmark-specific results from one research group, pending independent replication.
Compatibility Matters: A Framework for Token-Level Teacher Selection in On-Policy Distillation
arXiv:2610.21234v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy distillation (OPD) has recently been introduced as a promising paradigm for continual learning, where a student policy can be supervised at the token-level. Typically, OPD is performed using a single teacher per prompt rollout (or even per training run). However, this ignores a whole other axis of flexibility that is available due to the on-policy nature - token-level teacher selection during rollouts. Building on this insight, we theoretically explore what makes a teacher and a student compatible for OPD, and leverage our findings to derive several empirical heuristics for teacher selection. In particular, our framework captures several desiderata for OPD: compatible teacher-student reasoning patterns, teacher competence, and induced student diversity. Theoretically, we categorize several types of teacher routing schemes, and we prove that under different scenarios, different routing schemes are likely to be beneficial for optimization and student diversity. We back up our findings with extensive experimental results in domains such as math, coding, kernel generation, and visual reasoning, where we find upwards of 10 percentage points of improvement on pass@$k$ when compared to vanilla OPD and the teacher experts on certain tasks, indicating both capability improvement and diversity over high-quality responses.
Abstract:On-policy distillation (OPD) has recently been introduced as a promising paradigm for continual learning, where a student policy can be supervised at the token-level. Typically, OPD is performed using a single teacher per prompt rollout (or even per training run). However, this ignores a whole other axis of flexibility that is available due to the on-policy nature - token-level teacher selection during rollouts. Building on this insight, we theoretically explore what makes a teacher and a student compatible for OPD, and leverage our findings to derive several empirical heuristics for teacher selection. In particular, our framework captures several desiderata for OPD: compatible teacher-student reasoning patterns, teacher competence, and induced student diversity. Theoretically, we categorize several types of teacher routing schemes, and we prove that under different scenarios, different routing schemes are likely to be beneficial for optimization and student diversity. We back up our findings with extensive experimental results in domains such as math, coding, kernel generation, and visual reasoning, where we find upwards of 10 percentage points of improvement on pass@$k$ when compared to vanilla OPD and the teacher experts on certain tasks, indicating both capability improvement and diversity over high-quality responses.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.21234 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.21234v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.21234 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 287 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Build a Physical AI model factory with NVIDIA Cosmos 3 on SageMaker HyperPod
AWS · 4 sept. 2026
Debugging Logprob Mismatches in LLM Reinforcement Learning
AMD · 23 sept. 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026