analiza aiqbench
The article finds that Claude Opus, Sonnet, and Haiku all passed its 11 coding tasks and one Claude Code bug fix, so price per token drove its recommendations. The sample is small, and its claim that Opus may win on long, high-stakes work is untested by the authors. The cost comparison is a useful starting point, but the promoted Ori Eval tool is a vendor pitch, so readers should run their own evals before choosing.
Claude Opus vs Sonnet vs Haiku: Which Should You Use?
Use Claude Sonnet 5.5 as your default, Haiku 5.5 for high-volume and sub-agent work, and Opus 5.5 for long tasks where a mistake is costly. We compared the three on price, benchmarks, 11 coding tasks with hidden tests and a Claude Code bug fix. All three passed everything, so the difference was cost.
Use Claude Sonnet 5.5 as your default, Claude Haiku 5.5 for high-volume and sub-agent work, and Claude Opus 5.5 when a task is long, ambiguous, or expensive to get wrong. For most teams, the choice is between Opus and Sonnet, and the question is whether Opus is worth twice Sonnet’s price per token. On the coding tasks we tested, it wasn’t. We gave each model the same 11 coding tasks with hidden tests and the same bug-fix task in Claude Code. Every model passed everything, so what separated them was cost. Haiku was 19 to 30 times cheaper than Opus per task, and Sonnet cost between half and two-thirds as much as Opus. Those results tell you how the three did on our tasks. The only way to know which one is best for your workflow is to test them on your own work. Ori Eval does this for you. You ask your coding agent which model is best for your project, and it finds test material in your code, writes the eval, runs the models you want to compare, and recommends one with the scores, times, and costs behind it. The section on switching between…
Extras afișat conform termenilor RSS ai publicației · 196 cuvinte · textul integral și figurile sunt pe site-ul publicației
