analiza aiqbench
TechPulse take: CineSubBench introduces a novel benchmark for assessing large language models on long-form narrative comprehension using multilingual movie subtitles. The dataset challenges models to reconstruct complex causal relationships and cultural nuances without explicit scene structures, revealing significant gaps in cross-lingual consistency and safety calibration across different national rating systems. This work expands the evaluation landscape beyond traditional technical domains into culturally situated understanding, marking a pivotal step toward more robust AI systems capable of handling diverse human contexts.
CineSubBench: Evaluating LLMs on Long-Form Narrative and Cultural Understanding from Multilingual Movie Subtitles
arXiv:2609.36218v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly evaluated in specialized domains such as law, medicine, software engineering, and cybersecurity, yet film remains comparatively underexplored despite requiring long-form narrative integration, multilingual interpretation, and culturally situated audience judgments. We introduce CineSubBench, a benchmark for evaluating long-context film understanding from multilingual movie subtitles. A subtitle track represents a film as thousands of short, temporally ordered utterances from which models must reconstruct characters, relationships, events, causal progression, and themes without explicit scene or event structure. CineSubBench contains 1,012 films with complete subtitle coverage in six languages, yielding 6,072 tracks and 8.13M timestamped subtitle entries. It provides a matched multi-task, multilingual, and multicultural (MultiX) evaluation setting: seven tasks span narrative reconstruction and abstraction, genre prediction, age suitability, country-specific motion-picture ratings across ten national classification systems, and subtitle-grounded language safety. Across nine LLMs, plot premises are recovered more reliably than event-complete synopses; cross-lingual consistency varies substantially across models and languages; national rating systems expose distinct calibration patterns; and strong profanity is far easier to ground than mild obscenity. CineSubBench establishes film as a long-context LLM evaluation domain and provides a unified benchmark for measuring narrative, multilingual, cultural, and evidence-grounding capabilities.
Abstract:Large language models are increasingly evaluated in specialized domains such as law, medicine, software engineering, and cybersecurity, yet film remains comparatively underexplored despite requiring long-form narrative integration, multilingual interpretation, and culturally situated audience judgments. We introduce CineSubBench, a benchmark for evaluating long-context film understanding from multilingual movie subtitles. A subtitle track represents a film as thousands of short, temporally ordered utterances from which models must reconstruct characters, relationships, events, causal progression, and themes without explicit scene or event structure. CineSubBench contains 1,012 films with complete subtitle coverage in six languages, yielding 6,072 tracks and 8.13M timestamped subtitle entries. It provides a matched multi-task, multilingual, and multicultural (MultiX) evaluation setting: seven tasks span narrative reconstruction and abstraction, genre prediction, age suitability, country-specific motion-picture ratings across ten national classification systems, and subtitle-grounded language safety. Across nine LLMs, plot premises are recovered more reliably than event-complete synopses; cross-lingual consistency varies substantially across models and languages; national rating systems expose distinct calibration patterns; and strong profanity is far easier to ground than mild obscenity. CineSubBench establishes film as a long-context LLM evaluation domain and provides a unified benchmark for measuring narrative, multilingual, cultural, and evidence-grounding capabilities.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.36218 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.36218v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36218 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 296 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · 15 iun. 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · 13 oct. 2026
Dialogue with Eliezer Yudkowsky on Neural Networks
LessWrong · 2 oct. 2026
The Case Against Slowing Down AI
LessWrong · 29 sept. 2026