analiza aiqbench
This paper critically examines the evaluation gaps in Explainable AI (XAI), specifically highlighting difficulties when models encounter evolving data streams and concept drift. It proposes human-grounded assessment methods for image classification systems, including bias detection tools like DetoxAI, while discussing strategies to adapt counterfactual explanations over time. The work underscores the necessity of tracking the co-evolution between datasets, model architectures, and their corresponding explanations to ensure robustness in dynamic environments.
Challenges in Evaluating Explanation Methods for Static and Evolving Data
arXiv:2608.06351v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper addresses the limitations of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) with respect to insufficient evaluation. They are illustrated through the DetoxAI image recognition system for bias detection and concept unlearning. Then, an example of a human-grounded evaluation of methods for explaining image classification is presented. The paper further explores methods for adapting explanations to evolving data streams with concept drift. Experiences with adapting counterfactuals for this problem are discussed. Finally it is related to the challenges of tracking the co-evolution of data, models, and explanations.\footnote{This paper has been accepted for a publication in J.Nalepa (ed) Explainable AI in Space. Proceedings of EASi 2026 Workshop at IJCAI-ECAI 2026 Bremen, Springer CCIS vol 3107 (2016).}
Abstract:This paper addresses the limitations of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) with respect to insufficient evaluation. They are illustrated through the DetoxAI image recognition system for bias detection and concept unlearning. Then, an example of a human-grounded evaluation of methods for explaining image classification is presented. The paper further explores methods for adapting explanations to evolving data streams with concept drift. Experiences with adapting counterfactuals for this problem are discussed. Finally it is related to the challenges of tracking the co-evolution of data, models, and explanations.\footnote{This paper has been accepted for a publication in this http URL (ed) Explainable AI in Space. Proceedings of EASi 2026 Workshop at IJCAI-ECAI 2026 Bremen, Springer CCIS vol 3107 (2016).}
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.06351 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.06351v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.06351 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 209 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026

How an assessor could investigate alignment of unreleased AI models
METR · 14 oct. 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 18 sept. 2026

AI Transparency: Governance, Explainability, and Data Practices
Databricks · 20 iul. 2026