Certification failure in variational-principle observables

Abstract:Algorithms which prepare states via the variational principle assume that closeness in energy implies closeness in state; we formalise how this assumption can fail by showing that a ground-state energy estimate converged to within $\epsilon$ of the true value is compatible with observable expectation values in error by up to $\sqrt{2\epsilon\chi_O}$ at leading order, where $\chi_O$ is the static susceptibility of the observable. As a result, the observable error can be orders of magnitude larger than the energy error, a mechanism we call non-linear error amplification, and because a variational algorithm cannot guarantee the correctness of these properties from energy alone, energy does not necessarily certify an observable. In light of our findings, we examine three algorithms: the variational quantum eigensolver on the transverse-field Ising chain, the density-matrix renormalisation group on a pair of weakly coupled hydrogen chains, and Krylov quantum diagonalisation on lithium fluoride. In each case we demonstrate that a well-converged energy can leave observables uncertified.

arXiv:2610.03989 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2610.03989v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.03989 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.